From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: iio: improve atmel-adc documentation
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226173904.GG607@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393434074-15600-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Hi Alexandre,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This corrects the example by removing the unit-address, as suggested by Mark
> Rutland in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/234184.html
I still belive that it's wrong, and Mark haven't answered my comments
on his statement.
I'd vote for a status-quo, until he gives an answer backed with
references to the ePAPR.
>
> Also, it removes the properties that are not used anymore, to stop propagating
> them.
>
> Finally, fixes a few typos.
I'm fine with the rest.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140226/ff2efc4a/attachment-0001.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
b.brezillon@overkiz.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: iio: improve atmel-adc documentation
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140226173904.GG607@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393434074-15600-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]
Hi Alexandre,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:01:08PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This corrects the example by removing the unit-address, as suggested by Mark
> Rutland in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/234184.html
I still belive that it's wrong, and Mark haven't answered my comments
on his statement.
I'd vote for a status-quo, until he gives an answer backed with
references to the ePAPR.
>
> Also, it removes the properties that are not used anymore, to stop propagating
> them.
>
> Finally, fixes a few typos.
I'm fine with the rest.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 17:01 [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: iio: improve atmel-adc documentation Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] Documentation: dt: iio: move arm/atmel-adc.txt to iio/adc/at91_adc.txt Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: at91/dt: at91-ariag25: remove useless adc properties Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: at91/dt: at91sam9260: " Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: at91/dt: at91sam9g45: " Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: at91/dt: at91sam9x5: " Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d3: " Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:01 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 17:39 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-02-26 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: iio: improve atmel-adc documentation Maxime Ripard
2014-02-26 21:00 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-02-26 21:00 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140226173904.GG607@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.