From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: wolfram-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org,
khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for SMBUS
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:21:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228212134.GC2517@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11165.1393507178-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 626 bytes --]
> > Also, the I2C tracing has first 'f' then 'a', that should be consistent,
> > too.
>
> Flags first or address first? Do you have a preference (for both)?
I'd say address first, yet no strong preference.
> > Can we have something like this for 'flags'?
>
> There's a __print_flags() which should work. One thing I'm concerned about
> there is how do we handle more flags being added - does that count as an ABI
> break if the printed format changes?
Not sure, I mean, this is debug output, no?
> SMBus flags are basically the same as I2C flags, right?
Basically, yes.
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: wolfram@the-dreams.de, khali@linux-fr.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for SMBUS
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:21:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140228212134.GC2517@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11165.1393507178@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 626 bytes --]
> > Also, the I2C tracing has first 'f' then 'a', that should be consistent,
> > too.
>
> Flags first or address first? Do you have a preference (for both)?
I'd say address first, yet no strong preference.
> > Can we have something like this for 'flags'?
>
> There's a __print_flags() which should work. One thing I'm concerned about
> there is how do we handle more flags being added - does that count as an ABI
> break if the printed format changes?
Not sure, I mean, this is debug output, no?
> SMBus flags are basically the same as I2C flags, right?
Basically, yes.
Thanks,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-28 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-09 21:49 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for I2C David Howells
[not found] ` <20140109214954.25590.73057.stgit-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-09 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for SMBUS David Howells
2014-01-09 21:50 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <20140109215002.25590.51609.stgit-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-18 20:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-18 20:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-27 13:19 ` David Howells
2014-02-27 13:19 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <11165.1393507178-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-28 21:21 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-02-28 21:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-01 7:48 ` David Howells
2014-03-06 13:13 ` David Howells
2014-03-06 13:13 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <19542.1394111635-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-06 13:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-06 13:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-06 13:38 ` David Howells
2014-01-22 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: Add message transfer tracepoints for I2C Wolfram Sang
2014-02-18 20:33 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-02-27 13:07 ` David Howells
2014-02-28 21:17 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-01 7:54 ` David Howells
2014-03-01 7:54 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140228212134.GC2517@katana \
--to=wsa-z923lk4zbo2bacvfa/9k2g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wolfram-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.