From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch] clocksource: exynos_mct: silence a static checker warning
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:57:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301135714.GD23929@elgon.mountain> (raw)
My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon
but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf()
could overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index ed49b25fa552..a6ee6d7cd63f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt);
mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
- sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
+ snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu);
evt->name = mevt->name;
evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] clocksource: exynos_mct: silence a static checker warning
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301135714.GD23929@elgon.mountain> (raw)
My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon
but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf()
could overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index ed49b25fa552..a6ee6d7cd63f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt);
mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
- sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
+ snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu);
evt->name = mevt->name;
evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dan.carpenter@oracle.com (Dan Carpenter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch] clocksource: exynos_mct: silence a static checker warning
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:57:14 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140301135714.GD23929@elgon.mountain> (raw)
My guess is we aren't going to have a 2 digit cpuid here any time soon
but the static checkers don't know that and complain that the snprintf()
could overflow.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
index ed49b25fa552..a6ee6d7cd63f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static int exynos4_local_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *evt)
mevt = container_of(evt, struct mct_clock_event_device, evt);
mevt->base = EXYNOS4_MCT_L_BASE(cpu);
- sprintf(mevt->name, "mct_tick%d", cpu);
+ snprintf(mevt->name, sizeof(mevt->name), "mct_tick%d", cpu);
evt->name = mevt->name;
evt->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-01 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-01 13:57 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2014-03-01 13:57 ` [patch] clocksource: exynos_mct: silence a static checker warning Dan Carpenter
2014-03-01 13:57 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140301135714.GD23929@elgon.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.