From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 23:39:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140303233902.GP18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwjSAPx=6x6r9hN_1hH406=TCnAyb=6s0BLt9=YsKy_wA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:23:55PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> This just uses a "flags" field, and we currently only have two bits
> that we use: FDPUT_FPUT and FDPUT_POS_UNLOCK. The first patch knows
> that "fget_light()" writes 0/1 for that, which is the same as the
> FDPUT_FPUT bit. I didn't bother to comment on it or clean it up, since
> the second patch just removes that whole fget_light() mess.
>
> Comments?
do_sendfile() is also there and this one is even more unpleasant ;-/
We probably can ignore that one (until POSIX learns of its existence),
thouhg...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 21:03 Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O George Spelvin
2014-03-03 21:26 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:01 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:28 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 23:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:42 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-04 0:23 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-04 1:05 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 20:00 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-05 0:04 ` Al Viro
2014-03-10 15:55 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:39 ` Al Viro [this message]
2014-03-03 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:54 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 20:11 ` Cedric Blancher
2014-03-04 0:07 ` George Spelvin
2014-05-04 7:04 ` Michael Kerrisk
[not found] <a8df285f-de7f-4a3a-9a19-e0ad07ab3a5c@blur>
2014-02-20 18:15 ` Zuckerman, Boris
2014-02-20 18:15 ` Zuckerman, Boris
2014-02-20 18:29 ` Al Viro
2014-02-21 6:01 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-02-23 1:18 ` Kevin Easton
2014-02-23 7:38 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-17 15:41 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-02-18 13:00 ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-02-20 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 21:45 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:09 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:10 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-06 15:03 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-07 3:38 ` Yongzhi Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140303233902.GP18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.