From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: [sched/balance] 815296e0446: -71.2% cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:58:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304015845.GA12265@localhost> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8298 bytes --]
Alex,
FYI, we noticed the below changes on commit
https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git single-balance
815296e0446ff6c405ef647082024ce3d8183e10 ("sched: unify imbalance bias for target group")
test case: lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/compute
bf0607d57b0b3ef 815296e0446ff6c405ef64708
--------------- -------------------------
465050 ~ 9% -71.2% 134141 ~16% cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
10109 ~33% -63.0% 3743 ~25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.min_vruntime
7163 ~31% -63.2% 2638 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.MIN_vruntime
7166 ~31% -63.1% 2641 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.max_vruntime
1722 ~10% -34.7% 1124 ~27% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.MIN_vruntime
1725 ~10% -34.6% 1127 ~27% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.max_vruntime
7774 ~18% +47.0% 11430 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.runnable_load_avg
8117 ~18% +47.2% 11946 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.load
8106 ~18% +47.4% 11946 ~20% sched_debug.cpu#9.load
7787 ~18% +47.1% 11457 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#9.cpu_load
7319 ~23% +42.4% 10420 ~21% sched_debug.cpu#30.cpu_load
7287 ~23% +42.8% 10404 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[30]:/.runnable_load_avg
7757 ~19% +58.1% 12268 ~31% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.tg_load_contrib
7821 ~21% +52.2% 11904 ~24% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load
7956 ~18% +49.0% 11856 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.runnable_load_avg
1722 ~16% -42.6% 989 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.MIN_vruntime
1726 ~16% -42.5% 991 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.max_vruntime
8357 ~15% +44.4% 12068 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.tg_load_contrib
8513 ~15% +48.6% 12648 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.tg_load_contrib
2050 ~19% -34.7% 1339 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.min_vruntime
7278 ~16% +46.6% 10667 ~21% sched_debug.cpu#25.cpu_load
7 ~20% +48.6% 11 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#9.nr_running
7 ~20% +48.6% 11 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.nr_running
7285 ~16% +46.0% 10639 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[25]:/.runnable_load_avg
8495 ~18% +35.5% 11513 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#14.load
8489 ~18% +35.6% 11513 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[14]:/.load
7985 ~24% +37.9% 11015 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#12.cpu_load
7983 ~25% +38.3% 11043 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[12]:/.runnable_load_avg
7123 ~15% +52.4% 10853 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[24]:/.load
1671 ~10% -36.6% 1059 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.MIN_vruntime
7128 ~15% +52.2% 10853 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#24.load
1674 ~10% -36.6% 1062 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.max_vruntime
7997 ~13% +48.2% 11852 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[8]:/.tg_load_contrib
2039 ~15% -31.0% 1408 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.min_vruntime
8556 ~22% +38.2% 11821 ~18% sched_debug.cfs_rq[12]:/.tg_load_contrib
952 ~12% +59.6% 1520 ~ 6% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
7553 ~14% +49.0% 11253 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[24]:/.tg_load_contrib
2013 ~11% -27.5% 1459 ~17% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.min_vruntime
431 ~21% +68.8% 727 ~26% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
8512 ~10% +31.5% 11197 ~14% sched_debug.cfs_rq[16]:/.tg_load_contrib
9269 ~18% +21.2% 11234 ~12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
7816 ~ 9% +29.7% 10139 ~15% sched_debug.cpu#22.cpu_load
8023 ~ 5% +38.9% 11146 ~12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.runnable_load_avg
8054 ~ 6% +38.5% 11156 ~11% sched_debug.cpu#7.cpu_load
2255 ~35% -44.4% 1253 ~28% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.MIN_vruntime
3.46 ~ 9% -24.4% 2.61 ~ 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.spread
2258 ~34% -44.4% 1256 ~28% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.max_vruntime
7752 ~ 9% +30.2% 10091 ~15% sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.runnable_load_avg
8579 ~ 6% +37.4% 11791 ~11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.tg_load_contrib
9337 ~18% +17.7% 10992 ~13% sched_debug.cpu#6.load
9337 ~18% +17.7% 10992 ~13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.load
8499 ~ 6% +37.1% 11654 ~10% sched_debug.cpu#7.load
8499 ~ 6% +37.1% 11654 ~10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.load
7 ~ 5% +38.5% 10 ~10% sched_debug.cpu#7.nr_running
7 ~ 5% +38.5% 10 ~10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.nr_running
45 ~23% -38.4% 28 ~33% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_uninterruptible
122137 ~10% +15.0% 140407 ~11% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
121019 ~10% +14.8% 138944 ~11% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
545505 ~ 9% +14.4% 623974 ~11% numa-meminfo.node1.Active
4788 ~ 6% +24.6% 5967 ~12% sched_debug.cpu#19.nr_switches
1183156 ~10% +7.8% 1276020 ~10% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
8845 ~ 8% +27.6% 11285 ~ 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.tg_load_contrib
8338 ~ 8% +43.9% 11997 ~20% sched_debug.cpu#23.load
8322 ~ 8% +44.2% 11997 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.load
7 ~10% +51.4% 11 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.nr_running
7 ~10% +51.4% 11 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#23.nr_running
5982 ~11% -18.4% 4878 ~ 5% sched_debug.cpu#20.nr_switches
5145 ~ 4% -15.7% 4335 ~ 7% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_switches
10354 ~15% +24.9% 12936 ~ 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[25]:/.tg_load_contrib
3.20 ~ 4% -15.2% 2.72 ~ 3% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.spread
6547 ~ 7% -15.9% 5509 ~ 5% slabinfo.shmem_inode_cache.num_objs
250366 ~ 3% +12.9% 282665 ~ 4% proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
248251 ~ 3% +12.6% 279447 ~ 4% proc-vmstat.nr_anon_pages
1011621 ~ 2% +11.6% 1128719 ~ 4% meminfo.Active(anon)
6506 ~ 7% -15.4% 5507 ~ 5% slabinfo.shmem_inode_cache.active_objs
1003281 ~ 2% +11.2% 1116144 ~ 3% meminfo.AnonPages
4011 ~ 4% +10.3% 4424 ~ 6% sched_debug.cpu#7.nr_switches
1132480 ~ 2% +10.3% 1249495 ~ 3% meminfo.Active
6293 ~ 4% +8.9% 6852 ~ 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
3.29 ~ 6% -8.4% 3.01 ~ 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.spread
4272 ~ 2% -8.0% 3928 ~ 3% sched_debug.cpu#8.curr->pid
6421 ~ 3% +7.3% 6891 ~ 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
14672 ~ 1% +19.0% 17462 ~ 3% time.voluntary_context_switches
6073 ~ 2% +5.2% 6387 ~ 3% vmstat.system.cs
22.49 ~ 0% +0.7% 22.65 ~ 0% boottime.dhcp
time.voluntary_context_switches
22000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
O O |
21000 ++ O O O O |
20000 ++ O O O O O |
| O O O O |
19000 ++ O O |
| O |
18000 ++ O O
| O O |
17000 ++ O |
16000 ++ O |
| |
15000 ++ *.. *.. |
*..*..*..*..*..*. .. *..*..*.. .. *..*..*..* |
14000 ++---------------*--------------*----------------------------------+
Thanks,
Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@01.org
Subject: [sched/balance] 815296e0446: -71.2% cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:58:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304015845.GA12265@localhost> (raw)
Alex,
FYI, we noticed the below changes on commit
https://github.com/alexshi/power-scheduling.git single-balance
815296e0446ff6c405ef647082024ce3d8183e10 ("sched: unify imbalance bias for target group")
test case: lkp-snb01/micro/aim7/compute
bf0607d57b0b3ef 815296e0446ff6c405ef64708
--------------- -------------------------
465050 ~ 9% -71.2% 134141 ~16% cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
10109 ~33% -63.0% 3743 ~25% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.min_vruntime
7163 ~31% -63.2% 2638 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.MIN_vruntime
7166 ~31% -63.1% 2641 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.max_vruntime
1722 ~10% -34.7% 1124 ~27% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.MIN_vruntime
1725 ~10% -34.6% 1127 ~27% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.max_vruntime
7774 ~18% +47.0% 11430 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.runnable_load_avg
8117 ~18% +47.2% 11946 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.load
8106 ~18% +47.4% 11946 ~20% sched_debug.cpu#9.load
7787 ~18% +47.1% 11457 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#9.cpu_load
7319 ~23% +42.4% 10420 ~21% sched_debug.cpu#30.cpu_load
7287 ~23% +42.8% 10404 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[30]:/.runnable_load_avg
7757 ~19% +58.1% 12268 ~31% sched_debug.cfs_rq[26]:/.tg_load_contrib
7821 ~21% +52.2% 11904 ~24% sched_debug.cpu#11.cpu_load
7956 ~18% +49.0% 11856 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.runnable_load_avg
1722 ~16% -42.6% 989 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.MIN_vruntime
1726 ~16% -42.5% 991 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.max_vruntime
8357 ~15% +44.4% 12068 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.tg_load_contrib
8513 ~15% +48.6% 12648 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[11]:/.tg_load_contrib
2050 ~19% -34.7% 1339 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.min_vruntime
7278 ~16% +46.6% 10667 ~21% sched_debug.cpu#25.cpu_load
7 ~20% +48.6% 11 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#9.nr_running
7 ~20% +48.6% 11 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.nr_running
7285 ~16% +46.0% 10639 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[25]:/.runnable_load_avg
8495 ~18% +35.5% 11513 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#14.load
8489 ~18% +35.6% 11513 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[14]:/.load
7985 ~24% +37.9% 11015 ~19% sched_debug.cpu#12.cpu_load
7983 ~25% +38.3% 11043 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[12]:/.runnable_load_avg
7123 ~15% +52.4% 10853 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[24]:/.load
1671 ~10% -36.6% 1059 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.MIN_vruntime
7128 ~15% +52.2% 10853 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#24.load
1674 ~10% -36.6% 1062 ~24% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.max_vruntime
7997 ~13% +48.2% 11852 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[8]:/.tg_load_contrib
2039 ~15% -31.0% 1408 ~19% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.min_vruntime
8556 ~22% +38.2% 11821 ~18% sched_debug.cfs_rq[12]:/.tg_load_contrib
952 ~12% +59.6% 1520 ~ 6% cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
7553 ~14% +49.0% 11253 ~21% sched_debug.cfs_rq[24]:/.tg_load_contrib
2013 ~11% -27.5% 1459 ~17% sched_debug.cfs_rq[13]:/.min_vruntime
431 ~21% +68.8% 727 ~26% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.blocked_load_avg
8512 ~10% +31.5% 11197 ~14% sched_debug.cfs_rq[16]:/.tg_load_contrib
9269 ~18% +21.2% 11234 ~12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.tg_load_contrib
7816 ~ 9% +29.7% 10139 ~15% sched_debug.cpu#22.cpu_load
8023 ~ 5% +38.9% 11146 ~12% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.runnable_load_avg
8054 ~ 6% +38.5% 11156 ~11% sched_debug.cpu#7.cpu_load
2255 ~35% -44.4% 1253 ~28% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.MIN_vruntime
3.46 ~ 9% -24.4% 2.61 ~ 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.spread
2258 ~34% -44.4% 1256 ~28% sched_debug.cfs_rq[3]:/.max_vruntime
7752 ~ 9% +30.2% 10091 ~15% sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.runnable_load_avg
8579 ~ 6% +37.4% 11791 ~11% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.tg_load_contrib
9337 ~18% +17.7% 10992 ~13% sched_debug.cpu#6.load
9337 ~18% +17.7% 10992 ~13% sched_debug.cfs_rq[6]:/.load
8499 ~ 6% +37.1% 11654 ~10% sched_debug.cpu#7.load
8499 ~ 6% +37.1% 11654 ~10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.load
7 ~ 5% +38.5% 10 ~10% sched_debug.cpu#7.nr_running
7 ~ 5% +38.5% 10 ~10% sched_debug.cfs_rq[7]:/.nr_running
45 ~23% -38.4% 28 ~33% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_uninterruptible
122137 ~10% +15.0% 140407 ~11% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_anon
121019 ~10% +14.8% 138944 ~11% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_anon_pages
545505 ~ 9% +14.4% 623974 ~11% numa-meminfo.node1.Active
4788 ~ 6% +24.6% 5967 ~12% sched_debug.cpu#19.nr_switches
1183156 ~10% +7.8% 1276020 ~10% numa-meminfo.node1.MemUsed
8845 ~ 8% +27.6% 11285 ~ 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.tg_load_contrib
8338 ~ 8% +43.9% 11997 ~20% sched_debug.cpu#23.load
8322 ~ 8% +44.2% 11997 ~20% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.load
7 ~10% +51.4% 11 ~22% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.nr_running
7 ~10% +51.4% 11 ~22% sched_debug.cpu#23.nr_running
5982 ~11% -18.4% 4878 ~ 5% sched_debug.cpu#20.nr_switches
5145 ~ 4% -15.7% 4335 ~ 7% sched_debug.cpu#13.nr_switches
10354 ~15% +24.9% 12936 ~ 9% sched_debug.cfs_rq[25]:/.tg_load_contrib
3.20 ~ 4% -15.2% 2.72 ~ 3% sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.spread
6547 ~ 7% -15.9% 5509 ~ 5% slabinfo.shmem_inode_cache.num_objs
250366 ~ 3% +12.9% 282665 ~ 4% proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
248251 ~ 3% +12.6% 279447 ~ 4% proc-vmstat.nr_anon_pages
1011621 ~ 2% +11.6% 1128719 ~ 4% meminfo.Active(anon)
6506 ~ 7% -15.4% 5507 ~ 5% slabinfo.shmem_inode_cache.active_objs
1003281 ~ 2% +11.2% 1116144 ~ 3% meminfo.AnonPages
4011 ~ 4% +10.3% 4424 ~ 6% sched_debug.cpu#7.nr_switches
1132480 ~ 2% +10.3% 1249495 ~ 3% meminfo.Active
6293 ~ 4% +8.9% 6852 ~ 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
3.29 ~ 6% -8.4% 3.01 ~ 7% sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.spread
4272 ~ 2% -8.0% 3928 ~ 3% sched_debug.cpu#8.curr->pid
6421 ~ 3% +7.3% 6891 ~ 4% slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
14672 ~ 1% +19.0% 17462 ~ 3% time.voluntary_context_switches
6073 ~ 2% +5.2% 6387 ~ 3% vmstat.system.cs
22.49 ~ 0% +0.7% 22.65 ~ 0% boottime.dhcp
time.voluntary_context_switches
22000 ++-----------------------------------------------------------------+
O O |
21000 ++ O O O O |
20000 ++ O O O O O |
| O O O O |
19000 ++ O O |
| O |
18000 ++ O O
| O O |
17000 ++ O |
16000 ++ O |
| |
15000 ++ *.. *.. |
*..*..*..*..*..*. .. *..*..*.. .. *..*..*..* |
14000 ++---------------*--------------*----------------------------------+
Thanks,
Fengguang
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-04 1:58 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2014-03-04 1:58 ` [sched/balance] 815296e0446: -71.2% cpuidle.C3-SNB.time Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140304015845.GA12265@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.