From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bill Sumner <bill.sumner@hp.com>
Cc: indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, bhe@redhat.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com,
doug.hatch@hp.com, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, zhenhua@hp.com, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304150611.GE2799@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389391652-52422-1-git-send-email-bill.sumner@hp.com>
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Bill Sumner wrote:
> Bill Sumner (6):
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Flags-and-Prototype
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Utility-functions
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Domain-Interfaces
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Copy-Translations
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Debug-Print-IOMMU
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Call-From-Mainline
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 1293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 1225 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
This is a pretty big change, before merging I would like to get more
eyes on it. Please make sure you get more reviews on the code and the
general concept. A few things I noticed while looking at it:
* You put a lot of code into #define CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP. Isn't the same
approach necessary to for KEXEC?
* Please get rid of all the pr_debug stuff.
* I think it makes sense to put the functions to access the IOMMU
configuration values of the old kernel into a new file. This is better
than adding over 1000 new lines to intel-iommu.c
* I have seen your new single-patch for this change. A single patch with
more than 1200 changed lines is not something anyone is willing to
review. Please split the patches again in a meaningful and bisectable
way.
Thanks,
Joerg
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Bill Sumner <bill.sumner-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Cc: bhe-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kexec-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
doug.hatch-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org,
ishii.hironobu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
zhenhua-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org,
dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304150611.GE2799@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389391652-52422-1-git-send-email-bill.sumner-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Bill Sumner wrote:
> Bill Sumner (6):
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Flags-and-Prototype
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Utility-functions
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Domain-Interfaces
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Copy-Translations
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Debug-Print-IOMMU
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Call-From-Mainline
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 1293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 1225 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
This is a pretty big change, before merging I would like to get more
eyes on it. Please make sure you get more reviews on the code and the
general concept. A few things I noticed while looking at it:
* You put a lot of code into #define CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP. Isn't the same
approach necessary to for KEXEC?
* Please get rid of all the pr_debug stuff.
* I think it makes sense to put the functions to access the IOMMU
configuration values of the old kernel into a new file. This is better
than adding over 1000 new lines to intel-iommu.c
* I have seen your new single-patch for this change. A single patch with
more than 1200 changed lines is not something anyone is willing to
review. Please split the patches again in a meaningful and bisectable
way.
Thanks,
Joerg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Bill Sumner <bill.sumner@hp.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, bhe@redhat.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ddutile@redhat.com,
ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
doug.hatch@hp.com, zhenhua@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304150611.GE2799@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389391652-52422-1-git-send-email-bill.sumner@hp.com>
Hi Bill,
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Bill Sumner wrote:
> Bill Sumner (6):
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Flags-and-Prototype
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Utility-functions
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Domain-Interfaces
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Copy-Translations
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Debug-Print-IOMMU
> Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Call-From-Mainline
>
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 1293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 1225 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
This is a pretty big change, before merging I would like to get more
eyes on it. Please make sure you get more reviews on the code and the
general concept. A few things I noticed while looking at it:
* You put a lot of code into #define CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP. Isn't the same
approach necessary to for KEXEC?
* Please get rid of all the pr_debug stuff.
* I think it makes sense to put the functions to access the IOMMU
configuration values of the old kernel into a new file. This is better
than adding over 1000 new lines to intel-iommu.c
* I have seen your new single-patch for this change. A single patch with
more than 1200 changed lines is not something anyone is willing to
review. Please split the patches again in a meaningful and bisectable
way.
Thanks,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 22:07 [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Flags-and-Prototype Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Utility-functions Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Domain-Interfaces Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-03-04 14:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-03-04 14:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-03-04 14:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-03-10 19:23 ` Sumner, William
2014-03-10 19:23 ` Sumner, William
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Copy-Translations Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Debug-Print-IOMMU Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Call-From-Mainline Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-10 22:07 ` Bill Sumner
2014-01-25 2:44 ` [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU Baoquan He
2014-01-25 2:44 ` Baoquan He
2014-01-25 2:44 ` Baoquan He
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-03-04 15:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2014-03-10 19:10 ` Sumner, William
2014-03-10 19:10 ` Sumner, William
2014-03-10 19:10 ` Sumner, William
2014-03-10 21:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-10 21:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-03-10 21:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-07 20:43 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-07 20:43 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-07 20:43 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-08 16:14 ` David Woodhouse
2014-04-08 16:14 ` David Woodhouse
2014-04-08 18:42 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-08 18:42 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-08 18:42 ` Don Dutile
2014-04-25 18:11 ` Sumner, William
2014-04-25 18:11 ` Sumner, William
2014-04-25 18:11 ` Sumner, William
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-12 16:15 Sumner, William
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140304150611.GE2799@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bill.sumner@hp.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhenhua@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.