From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [blk-lib] 6a0608544e5: fileio -77.4% max latency, -5.7% throughput
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:52:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304215225.GH11655@kmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140304132130.GB28854@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5298 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:21:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git for-jens
> commit 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285119547eae41abe5 ("blk-lib.c: generic_make_request() handles large bios now")
>
> test case: snb-drag/sysbench/fileio/600s-100%-1HDD-ext4-64G-1024-seqrewr-sync
I'm trying to figure out how to parse this and the graphs - where do I find the
test? And is there anything you can point me to for the graphs, or is that
output from that test?
>
> 11541d5f5b7002b 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285
> --------------- -------------------------
> 1885 ~60% -77.4% 426 ~ 7% TOTAL fileio.request_latency_max_ms
> 6258 ~ 0% -5.7% 5904 ~ 0% TOTAL fileio.requests_per_sec
> 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_slabs
> 217 ~ 1% +682.3% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_objs
> 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_slabs
> 211 ~ 2% +701.5% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_objs
> 2 ~ 0% -50.0% 1 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.procs.b
> 2236 ~ 0% +63.6% 3659 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_objs
> 2217 ~ 0% +63.4% 3623 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
> 3274 ~ 1% +47.8% 4837 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> 13096 ~ 1% +47.7% 19350 ~ 2% TOTAL meminfo.SUnreclaim
> 62558204 ~ 5% -30.7% 43379766 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
> 91031 ~ 4% -29.4% 64253 ~ 2% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> 34092 ~ 2% -17.6% 28085 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
> 2656 ~ 2% -15.0% 2258 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly
> 266339 ~ 2% +14.2% 304129 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C6-SNB.usage
> 21899 ~ 2% +9.6% 23992 ~ 2% TOTAL interrupts.RES
> 20 ~ 0% -8.0% 18 ~ 2% TOTAL time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> 3430189 ~ 0% -5.9% 3226430 ~ 0% TOTAL time.voluntary_context_switches
> 117 ~ 0% -6.0% 110 ~ 0% TOTAL time.system_time
> 11691 ~ 0% -5.6% 11042 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
> 711 ~ 0% +4.4% 742 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.await
> 712 ~ 0% +4.4% 743 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.w_await
> 99142 ~ 0% -2.2% 96963 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.wkB/s
> 99257 ~ 0% -2.2% 97110 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.io.bo
> 139 ~ 0% +1.7% 141 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.avgqu-sz
>
>
>
> fileio.requests_per_sec
>
> 6300 ++----------------------------------------------------------*-------+
> 6250 *+.*.. .*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*. *..*..*
> | *. |
> 6200 ++ |
> 6150 ++ |
> | |
> 6100 ++ |
> 6050 ++ |
> 6000 ++ O |
> | O O |
> 5950 O+ O O |
> 5900 ++ O O O O O |
> | O O O O O O |
> 5850 ++ O O O |
> 5800 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> fileio.request_latency_max_ms
>
> 4500 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | * |
> 4000 ++ : |
> 3500 ++ :: |
> | : : |
> 3000 ++ * : : |
> 2500 ++ *.. + : * : : |
> | + + : + : : : |
> 2000 ++ .*.. + * : + : : : |
> 1500 ++ * *.. *.. .* * : .*..*..*..*..: : .*
> *.. .. .. .* *. : *. |
> 1000 ++ .* * *. * |
> 500 ++ *. O |
> O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> 0 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [blk-lib] 6a0608544e5: fileio -77.4% max latency, -5.7% throughput
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 13:52:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140304215225.GH11655@kmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140304132130.GB28854@localhost>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:21:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Kent,
>
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git for-jens
> commit 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285119547eae41abe5 ("blk-lib.c: generic_make_request() handles large bios now")
>
> test case: snb-drag/sysbench/fileio/600s-100%-1HDD-ext4-64G-1024-seqrewr-sync
I'm trying to figure out how to parse this and the graphs - where do I find the
test? And is there anything you can point me to for the graphs, or is that
output from that test?
>
> 11541d5f5b7002b 6a0608544e5672bd9a044c285
> --------------- -------------------------
> 1885 ~60% -77.4% 426 ~ 7% TOTAL fileio.request_latency_max_ms
> 6258 ~ 0% -5.7% 5904 ~ 0% TOTAL fileio.requests_per_sec
> 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_slabs
> 217 ~ 1% +682.3% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.num_objs
> 26 ~ 1% +702.3% 211 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_slabs
> 211 ~ 2% +701.5% 1697 ~ 8% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-4096.active_objs
> 2 ~ 0% -50.0% 1 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.procs.b
> 2236 ~ 0% +63.6% 3659 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.num_objs
> 2217 ~ 0% +63.4% 3623 ~ 3% TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
> 3274 ~ 1% +47.8% 4837 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable
> 13096 ~ 1% +47.7% 19350 ~ 2% TOTAL meminfo.SUnreclaim
> 62558204 ~ 5% -30.7% 43379766 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.time
> 91031 ~ 4% -29.4% 64253 ~ 2% TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-SNB.usage
> 34092 ~ 2% -17.6% 28085 ~ 1% TOTAL cpuidle.C3-SNB.usage
> 2656 ~ 2% -15.0% 2258 ~ 2% TOTAL proc-vmstat.kswapd_high_wmark_hit_quickly
> 266339 ~ 2% +14.2% 304129 ~ 0% TOTAL cpuidle.C6-SNB.usage
> 21899 ~ 2% +9.6% 23992 ~ 2% TOTAL interrupts.RES
> 20 ~ 0% -8.0% 18 ~ 2% TOTAL time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
> 3430189 ~ 0% -5.9% 3226430 ~ 0% TOTAL time.voluntary_context_switches
> 117 ~ 0% -6.0% 110 ~ 0% TOTAL time.system_time
> 11691 ~ 0% -5.6% 11042 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.system.cs
> 711 ~ 0% +4.4% 742 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.await
> 712 ~ 0% +4.4% 743 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.w_await
> 99142 ~ 0% -2.2% 96963 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.wkB/s
> 99257 ~ 0% -2.2% 97110 ~ 0% TOTAL vmstat.io.bo
> 139 ~ 0% +1.7% 141 ~ 0% TOTAL iostat.sda.avgqu-sz
>
>
>
> fileio.requests_per_sec
>
> 6300 ++----------------------------------------------------------*-------+
> 6250 *+.*.. .*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*..*.*..*..*..*..*. *..*..*
> | *. |
> 6200 ++ |
> 6150 ++ |
> | |
> 6100 ++ |
> 6050 ++ |
> 6000 ++ O |
> | O O |
> 5950 O+ O O |
> 5900 ++ O O O O O |
> | O O O O O O |
> 5850 ++ O O O |
> 5800 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> fileio.request_latency_max_ms
>
> 4500 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | * |
> 4000 ++ : |
> 3500 ++ :: |
> | : : |
> 3000 ++ * : : |
> 2500 ++ *.. + : * : : |
> | + + : + : : : |
> 2000 ++ .*.. + * : + : : : |
> 1500 ++ * *.. *.. .* * : .*..*..*..*..: : .*
> *.. .. .. .* *. : *. |
> 1000 ++ .* * *. * |
> 500 ++ *. O |
> O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O |
> 0 ++------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-04 13:21 [blk-lib] 6a0608544e5: fileio -77.4% max latency, -5.7% throughput Fengguang Wu
2014-03-04 13:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-03-04 21:52 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2014-03-04 21:52 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-03-05 1:16 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-03-05 1:16 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-03-05 1:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-05 1:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-03-05 2:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2014-03-05 2:07 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140304215225.GH11655@kmo \
--to=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.