From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:08:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311130825.GX9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCspVk+X3O23ikTt3MZUHVrrp21PyhmrcLF-GwW3OjOqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:47:49AM +0800, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Was the use of the cpu as a parameter in the initialization of
> sched_domain's flag a reason for asking for reworking the
> initialization of sched_domain ?
/me tries very hard to remember.. and fails.
Reading back the linked thread also doesn't seem to jog memory.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"mingo@kernel.org" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"fenghua.yu@intel.com" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
"schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"james.hogan@imgtec.com" <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:08:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140311130825.GX9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCspVk+X3O23ikTt3MZUHVrrp21PyhmrcLF-GwW3OjOqA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:47:49AM +0800, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Was the use of the cpu as a parameter in the initialization of
> sched_domain's flag a reason for asking for reworking the
> initialization of sched_domain ?
/me tries very hard to remember.. and fails.
Reading back the linked thread also doesn't seem to jog memory.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-05 7:18 [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [RFC 1/6] sched: remove unused SCHED_INIT_NODE Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: rework of sched_domain topology definition Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 17:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-05 17:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06 8:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-06 8:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 13:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-11 13:48 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [RFC 3/6] sched: s390: create a dedicated topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [RFC 4/6] sched: powerpc: " Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 10:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-11 10:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-11 13:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:18 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12 4:42 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-12 4:42 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-12 7:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12 7:44 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12 11:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-12 11:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-14 2:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-14 2:30 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-14 2:14 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-14 2:14 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [RFC 5/6] sched: add a new SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN for sched_domain Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 7:18 ` [RFC 6/6] sched: ARM: create a dedicated scheduler topology table Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 22:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-05 22:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06 8:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-06 8:42 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-05 23:17 ` [RFC 0/6] rework sched_domain topology description Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-05 23:17 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-06 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-06 12:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-06 12:31 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-07 2:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-07 2:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-08 12:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-08 12:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-10 13:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-10 13:21 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-11 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-12 13:28 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-12 13:28 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-12 13:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-12 13:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-13 14:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-13 14:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-17 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-17 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-19 19:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-19 19:15 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-03-20 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-20 8:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-03-11 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-03-11 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140311130825.GX9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.