All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>,
	Alexander Viro
	<viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Torvalds
	<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: SuSE O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK overload
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 04:00:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140312110015.GA29907@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53203BE5.402-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>

The SLES12 tree has various patches to implement special
O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK semantics for block devices:

	https://gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source/source/806eab3e4b02e798c1ae942440051f81c822ca35:patches.suse/block-nonblock-causes-failfast

this seems genuinely useful and I'd be really happy if people would do
this work upstream for two reasons:

 a) implementing different semantics only in a vendor kernel is a
    nightmare.  No proper way to document it in the man pages for
    example, and silent breakage of applications that expect it to be
    present, or even more nasty not present.
 b) Which brings us to: we had various issues with adding O_NONBLOCK to
    files that didn't support it before.  How well was this whole feature
    tested?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SuSE O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK overload
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 04:00:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140312110015.GA29907@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53203BE5.402@suse.de>

The SLES12 tree has various patches to implement special
O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK semantics for block devices:

	https://gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source/source/806eab3e4b02e798c1ae942440051f81c822ca35:patches.suse/block-nonblock-causes-failfast

this seems genuinely useful and I'd be really happy if people would do
this work upstream for two reasons:

 a) implementing different semantics only in a vendor kernel is a
    nightmare.  No proper way to document it in the man pages for
    example, and silent breakage of applications that expect it to be
    present, or even more nasty not present.
 b) Which brings us to: we had various issues with adding O_NONBLOCK to
    files that didn't support it before.  How well was this whole feature
    tested?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-12 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-30 13:26 [PATCH 0/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2014-01-30 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-07  1:18   ` Shaohua Li
2014-02-07 14:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-08  0:55       ` Shaohua Li
2014-02-10 10:33         ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-07 20:45   ` Jeff Moyer
2014-03-08 15:52     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-08 17:33       ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-08 19:51         ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-08 18:13           ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-08 21:33             ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-08 22:09               ` [PATCH] block: fix q->flush_rq NULL pointer crash on dm-mpath flush Mike Snitzer
2014-03-09  0:24                 ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-09  0:57                   ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-09  3:18                     ` Jens Axboe
2014-03-09  3:29                       ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-12 10:28           ` [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-12 10:50             ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-12 10:55               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-12 11:07                 ` Hannes Reinecke
     [not found]               ` <53203BE5.402-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-12 11:00                 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-03-12 11:00                   ` SuSE O_DIRECT|O_NONBLOCK overload Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]                   ` <20140312110015.GA29907-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13  0:15                     ` NeilBrown
2014-03-13  0:15                       ` NeilBrown
     [not found]                       ` <20140313111555.2f15f19f-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-14 17:46                         ` Mike Christie
2014-03-14 17:46                           ` Mike Christie
2014-03-13 16:13             ` [PATCH 1/1] block: rework flush sequencing for blk-mq Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14  9:25               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14  9:30                 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 12:44                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14  9:34                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14  9:52                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 10:58                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 11:10                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-03-14 13:00                 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-14 13:23                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-14 14:13                     ` Mike Snitzer
2014-03-15 13:28                       ` scsi_debug and mutipath, was " Christoph Hellwig
2014-03-17 11:55                       ` [dm-devel] " Bryn M. Reeves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140312110015.GA29907@infradead.org \
    --to=hch-wegcikhe2lqwvfeawa7xhq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.