From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, gordan@bobich.net
Subject: Re: Dealing with non-existent BDF devices in VT-d and in the hardware.
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:22:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140312142203.GG3245@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5320345702000078001231C2@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 09:17:59AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.03.14 at 18:30, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > To use this hack, apply the
> > 0001-xen-pci-Introduce-a-way-to-deal-with-buggy-hardware-.patch
> > to your hypervisor, compile and install.
>
> I'm still rather hesitant to consider such a pretty involved
> workaround for general inclusion. Did you investigate whether
> leveraging the grouping functionality (iommu_get_device_group())
> might be possible instead? We're talking about a legacy PCI bridge
> after all, and if done that way also covering the AMD IOMMU case
> might be more straightforward (after all that case is missing from
> your already large patch).
<nods>
I think other people have experienced other non-bridge issues.
I have CC-ed Gordan on this as he had a LSI card that was misbehaving.
I am curious to see what his lspci and lspci -vt looks for his culprit.
>
> While looking over this, I found that this only has a use in xend -
> another xl deficiency? And only for checking purposes, rather
Gosh.
> than to enforce the assignment of all (non-bridge?) devices in
> the group...
>
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-12 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-11 17:30 Dealing with non-existent BDF devices in VT-d and in the hardware Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-11 17:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-03-11 17:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-14 2:18 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-14 17:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-17 1:03 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-17 20:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-19 0:32 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-19 12:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-19 14:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20 0:48 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-20 7:14 ` Gordan Bobic
2014-03-20 10:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-24 2:37 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-24 7:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-12 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-12 14:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-03-12 17:10 ` Gordan Bobic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-20 1:34 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-20 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20 19:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140312142203.GG3245@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=gordan@bobich.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.