All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"gordan@bobich.net" <gordan@bobich.net>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Dealing with non-existent BDF devices in VT-d and in the hardware.
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 08:57:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140319125747.GB8694@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AA1AE19@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:32:31AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on 2014-03-18:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 01:03:00AM +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote on 2014-03-15:
> >>>> 
> >>>> What happens if you assign the devices under bus 09 to another guest?
> >>> 
> >>> Hadn't tried that. I think it would all blow up as the the
> >>> non-existent bridge is now assigned to one guest and the phantom
> >>> DMA requests for the
> >>> 09 would show up under the 08 device. I think I would corrupt the
> >>> guest memory with random DMA writes.
> >>> 
> >>>> Is it better to add Xen command line to add such devices to a
> >>>> group and
> >>> assign the whole group to a guest when trying to assign a device
> >>> of the group to guest?
> >>> 
> >>> Or implement the group assigment in QEMU or libxl so that nobody
> >>> tries doing it.
> >> 
> >> But I think user still need to tell which device is buggy manually
> >> and I don't
> > think QEMU or libxl can do it.
> > 
> > I think there are two issues here:
> > 
> > a) Missing device assigments via groups. That should be done irregardless
> >    if the device / hardware is buggy.
> >
> 
> Yes, this is missing.
> 
> > b) Buggy devices like the IDT bridge that I see. That is a seperate issue - and
> >    we just discussion if we want to inject that in the VT-d (or AMD-VI) what
> >    would be the mechanism to do that.
> 
> The question is that device 08:00.0 doesn't exist in your platform, you only saw the BDF in the DMA transaction. How can you add a non-exist device to a group? 

Why do I need to add it to a group? The patch I posted (see first email in this thread)
just made a fake PCI device in the Xen hypervisor. But I don't see libxl nor
QEMU doing any group operations - so why are they required? If I just bundle
all of the PCI devices underneath that bridge to the guest it should be OK, shouldn't it?

> 
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Yang
> >> 
> >>
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Yang
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-19 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-11 17:30 Dealing with non-existent BDF devices in VT-d and in the hardware Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-11 17:36 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-03-11 17:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-14  2:18     ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-14 17:51       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-17  1:03         ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-17 20:00           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-19  0:32             ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-19 12:57               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-03-19 14:24                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20  0:48                   ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-20  7:14                     ` Gordan Bobic
2014-03-20 10:04                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20  9:58                     ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-24  2:37                       ` Zhang, Yang Z
2014-03-24  7:25                         ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-12  9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-12 14:22   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-12 17:10     ` Gordan Bobic
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-20  1:34 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-20 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-20 19:44   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140319125747.GB8694@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=gordan@bobich.net \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.