Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] drivers: bus: omap_l3: Change pr_crit() to dev_err() when IRQ request fails

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [140312 14:08]:
> On Thursday 13 March 2014 01:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [140304 23:14]:
> >> On 03/04/2014 04:37 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 04 March 2014 08:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>>> Use dev_err() which will going to print the driver's name as well and the
> >>>> KERN_ERR level is sufficient in this case (we also print via dev_err when
> >>>> there is an error with the mem resources)
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c | 7 +++----
> >>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c b/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> >>>> index 0eff48585ae3..972691a668a3 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c
> >>>> @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ static int omap4_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>  	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, l3->debug_irq, l3_interrupt_handler,
> >>>>  			       IRQF_DISABLED, "l3-dbg-irq", l3);
> >>>>  	if (ret) {
> >>>> -		pr_crit("L3: request_irq failed to register for 0x%x\n",
> >>>> -						l3->debug_irq);
> >>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_irq failed for %d\n",
> >>>> +			l3->debug_irq);
> >>>>  		return ret;
> >>>>  	}
> >>>>  
> >>>> @@ -167,8 +167,7 @@ static int omap4_l3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>  	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, l3->app_irq, l3_interrupt_handler,
> >>>>  			       IRQF_DISABLED, "l3-app-irq", l3);
> >>>>  	if (ret)
> >>>> -		pr_crit("L3: request_irq failed to register for 0x%x\n",
> >>>> -						l3->app_irq);
> >>>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_irq failed for %d\n", l3->app_irq);
> >>>>  
> >>>>  	return ret;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>
> >>> So this one change in the log level. If I look at now, may be dev_err
> >>> is fine but the change is not same.
> >>
> >> Not sure what you mean by 'the change is not same'?
> >> I just picked the old series and rebased it on linux-next, the patch is the
> >> same as it was back in May 2013:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/2/205
> >>
> >> And yes, I have shortened the texts in the print, but the meaning of the
> >> prints have not changed.
> > 
> > Santosh, got any more comments on this series?
> > 
> Nope. looks good

OK probably best that Arnd or Olof picks these directly:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>