From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: sunxi: Change i2c compatibles
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314091353.GK2815@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140313173128.GC25870-NuALmloUBlrZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:37:22AM +0000, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The Allwinner A10 compatibles were following a slightly different compatible
> > patterns than the rest of the SoCs for historical reasons. Move to the other
> > pattern for consistency across all Allwinner Socs.
>
> Dropping support for the existing string breaks existing DTBs. Is
> this really necessary?
I added new ones at first, and Rob said it wasn't worth it since we
were a "work-in-progress" platform.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/229438.html
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: sunxi: Change i2c compatibles
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:13:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140314091353.GK2815@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140313173128.GC25870@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:37:22AM +0000, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The Allwinner A10 compatibles were following a slightly different compatible
> > patterns than the rest of the SoCs for historical reasons. Move to the other
> > pattern for consistency across all Allwinner Socs.
>
> Dropping support for the existing string breaks existing DTBs. Is
> this really necessary?
I added new ones at first, and Rob said it wasn't worth it since we
were a "work-in-progress" platform.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-February/229438.html
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140314/8d5d4eb4/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-14 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-13 11:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] i2c: sunxi: Change compatibles pattern Maxime Ripard
2014-03-13 11:37 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <1394710643-3411-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] i2c: sunxi: Change i2c compatibles Maxime Ripard
2014-03-13 11:37 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <1394710643-3411-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13 17:31 ` Mark Rutland
2014-03-13 17:31 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20140313173128.GC25870-NuALmloUBlrZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-14 9:13 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-03-14 9:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-13 11:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: sunxi: dt: Convert to the new " Maxime Ripard
2014-03-13 11:37 ` Maxime Ripard
[not found] ` <1394710643-3411-3-git-send-email-maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-03-13 21:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-13 21:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-03-24 14:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-24 14:39 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140314091353.GK2815@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard-wi1+55scjutkeb57/3fjtnbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.