All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:12:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317111213.GG27873@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394895894-8891-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Since the sun4i irq chip does not require any action and clears the interrupt
> when the level goes back to inactive, we don't need to mask / unmask for
> non oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we make sun4i_irq_ack a nop for all irqs
> except irq 0 and use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts.
> 
> Now there might be a case when the device reactivates the interrupt
> before the RETI. But that does not matter as we run the primary
> interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled.
> 
> This also allows us to get rid of needing to use 2 irq_chip structs, this
> means that the IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED will now influence
> all interrupts rather then just irq 0, but that does not matter as the eoi
> is now a nop anyways for all interrupts but irq 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> index a0ed1ea..6a8c88d 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  	int reg = irq / 32;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> +	if (irq != 0)
> +		return; /* Only IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs to be acked */
> +
>  	val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
>  	writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
>  	       sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
> @@ -76,13 +79,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  
>  static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
>  	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
> -	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
> -	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> -};
> -
> -/* IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs a late eoi call */
> -static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
> -	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
>  	.irq_eoi	= sun4i_irq_ack,
>  	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> @@ -92,13 +88,7 @@ static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
>  static int sun4i_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>  			 irq_hw_number_t hw)
>  {
> -	if (hw == 0)
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip_enmi,
> -					 handle_fasteoi_irq);
> -	else
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip,
> -					 handle_level_irq);
> -
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>  	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);

Oh.. And you just did. Nevermind then.

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140317/9e29c0b5/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:12:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317111213.GG27873@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394895894-8891-2-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2803 bytes --]

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Since the sun4i irq chip does not require any action and clears the interrupt
> when the level goes back to inactive, we don't need to mask / unmask for
> non oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we make sun4i_irq_ack a nop for all irqs
> except irq 0 and use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts.
> 
> Now there might be a case when the device reactivates the interrupt
> before the RETI. But that does not matter as we run the primary
> interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled.
> 
> This also allows us to get rid of needing to use 2 irq_chip structs, this
> means that the IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED will now influence
> all interrupts rather then just irq 0, but that does not matter as the eoi
> is now a nop anyways for all interrupts but irq 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> index a0ed1ea..6a8c88d 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  	int reg = irq / 32;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> +	if (irq != 0)
> +		return; /* Only IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs to be acked */
> +
>  	val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
>  	writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
>  	       sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
> @@ -76,13 +79,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  
>  static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
>  	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
> -	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
> -	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> -};
> -
> -/* IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs a late eoi call */
> -static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
> -	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
>  	.irq_eoi	= sun4i_irq_ack,
>  	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> @@ -92,13 +88,7 @@ static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
>  static int sun4i_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>  			 irq_hw_number_t hw)
>  {
> -	if (hw == 0)
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip_enmi,
> -					 handle_fasteoi_irq);
> -	else
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip,
> -					 handle_level_irq);
> -
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>  	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);

Oh.. And you just did. Nevermind then.

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 12:12:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140317111213.GG27873@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394895894-8891-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2743 bytes --]

On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Since the sun4i irq chip does not require any action and clears the interrupt
> when the level goes back to inactive, we don't need to mask / unmask for
> non oneshot IRQs, to achieve this we make sun4i_irq_ack a nop for all irqs
> except irq 0 and use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts.
> 
> Now there might be a case when the device reactivates the interrupt
> before the RETI. But that does not matter as we run the primary
> interrupt handlers with interrupts disabled.
> 
> This also allows us to get rid of needing to use 2 irq_chip structs, this
> means that the IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED | IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED will now influence
> all interrupts rather then just irq 0, but that does not matter as the eoi
> is now a nop anyways for all interrupts but irq 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> index a0ed1ea..6a8c88d 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ static void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  	int reg = irq / 32;
>  	u32 val;
>  
> +	if (irq != 0)
> +		return; /* Only IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs to be acked */
> +
>  	val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
>  	writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
>  	       sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
> @@ -76,13 +79,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
>  
>  static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
>  	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
> -	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
> -	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> -};
> -
> -/* IRQ 0 / the ENMI needs a late eoi call */
> -static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
> -	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
>  	.irq_eoi	= sun4i_irq_ack,
>  	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
>  	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
> @@ -92,13 +88,7 @@ static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip_enmi = {
>  static int sun4i_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
>  			 irq_hw_number_t hw)
>  {
> -	if (hw == 0)
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip_enmi,
> -					 handle_fasteoi_irq);
> -	else
> -		irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip,
> -					 handle_level_irq);
> -
> +	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &sun4i_irq_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
>  	set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);

Oh.. And you just did. Nevermind then.

Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-17 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-15 15:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all irqs Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04 ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] irqchip: sun4i: Use handle_fasteoi_irq for all interrupts Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04   ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04   ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-17 11:12   ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-03-17 11:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-17 11:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-19 11:36   ` [tip:irq/core] " tip-bot for Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip: sun4i: simplify sun4i_irq_ack Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04   ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-15 15:04   ` Hans de Goede
2014-03-17 11:12   ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-17 11:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-17 11:12     ` Maxime Ripard
2014-03-19 11:36   ` [tip:irq/core] irqchip: sun4i: Simplify sun4i_irq_ack tip-bot for Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140317111213.GG27873@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.