From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140320000011.GD22080@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532678A5.4090704@zytor.com>
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 09:23:01PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/16/2014 09:12 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> >
> > Unconditional eager allocation works. Can xen users count on this being included and applied to the
> > stable kernels?
> >
>
> I don't know. If we state that it is a bug fix for Xen it might be
> possible, but it would be up to Greg (Cc:'d) and the rest of the stable
> team.
If someone sends the git id of the commit in Linus's tree to the
stable@vger.kernel.org address, we will be glad to review it at that
point in time.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-20 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 16:17 [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception David Vrabel
2014-03-10 16:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 16:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 17:15 ` David Vrabel
2014-03-10 17:15 ` David Vrabel
2014-03-10 17:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 17:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 3:13 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:13 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:30 ` [PATCH] x86: Control CR0 TS behavior using dev_na_ts_allowed Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-17 12:42 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-17 14:05 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 14:18 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 15:28 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-18 18:07 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-18 19:14 ` David Vrabel
2014-03-17 12:44 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-18 17:48 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:32 ` [PATCH] x86, fpu, xen: Allocate fpu state for xen pv based on PVABI behavior Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:32 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:33 ` [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 3:35 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:35 ` [Xen-devel] " Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 3:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 4:12 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 4:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 4:23 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-20 0:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-20 0:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-03-20 2:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-20 2:29 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 4:12 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-17 13:29 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-03-19 13:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-19 15:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-19 15:02 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-23 13:08 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-03-05 22:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-03-05 22:08 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2015-03-06 11:46 ` [PATCHv4] x86, fpu: remove the logic of non-eager fpu mem allocation at the first usage David Vrabel
2015-03-06 11:46 ` David Vrabel
2014-06-23 13:08 ` [PATCHv1] x86: don't schedule when handling #NM exception Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-19 13:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-03-17 13:29 ` David Vrabel
2014-03-17 3:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 12:19 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 12:19 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2014-03-17 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 16:55 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 17:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-17 17:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 17:12 ` [Xen-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-18 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-18 8:14 ` [Xen-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2014-03-17 17:14 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-18 18:17 ` Sarah Newman
2014-03-18 18:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Sarah Newman
2014-03-18 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-18 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-17 17:14 ` George Dunlap
2014-03-17 17:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-03-17 3:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 16:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-10 16:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140320000011.GD22080@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=srn@prgmr.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.