Re: [PATCH] Add efi_early_call() macro

[Matt Fleming <matt-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>]

On Tue, 25 Mar, at 03:40:30PM, Roy Franz wrote:
> Add the efi_early_call() macro to invoke functions in the efi_early
> structure. Using a macro for these invocations allows the arm32/arm64
> architectures to define the macro differently so that they can directly
> invoke the boot services functions that are exposed in the efi_early
> structure on x86. Prior to the introduction of the efi_early structure
> the efi_call_physN macros were used on all architectures and allowed
> for this differentiation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c       |    5 +++++
>  drivers/firmware/efi/efi-stub-helper.c |   26 +++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Confused.

Why have you rewritten the patch that I sent Satuday morning?

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/22/61

I don't think your version goes far enough because you've left all the
efi_early->call() stuff in eboot.c. So now there's two ways to invoke
EFI functions in the x86 boot stub.

What's wrong with the patch that I sent?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center