From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] AArch64: TCR_TG1_64K incorrectly sets TCR_EL1 bits [31:30]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:58:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403085835.GC17022@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHWCVWJKiQxBBR43A3beG9f7dEw4JpkFGZ6V-Es8EAn0uW3WJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:21:29PM +0100, Joe Sylve wrote:
> That makes sense and I agree, it's better to fix it now so that it
> will be easier to add 16K paging later (on a side note is there any
> reason not to add it now if someone was willing to do the work?).
See another thread with the Samsung folks about the adding 4-levels of
page tables. We need a bit of refactoring first to decouple the page
size from the number of levels, after that 16K would be relatively easy
(it's easy now as well but I don't see the point on doing it before the
refactoring).
> There was talk in another thread about the possibility of adding a
> pagetable-4K-hwdef.h and pagetable-64K-hwdef.h. I think this is
> another example of why that might be a good idea as this stuff could
> be moved out of proc.S as to be bit more clean:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
> +#define TCR_TG_FLAGS TCR_TG0_64K | TCR_TG1_64K
> +#else
> +#define TCR_TG_FLAGS TCR_TG0_4K | TCR_TG1_4K
> +#endif
Yes, we could do this when we create the pgtable-*k-hwdef.h files.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Joe Sylve <joe.sylve@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] AArch64: TCR_TG1_64K incorrectly sets TCR_EL1 bits [31:30]
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:58:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403085835.GC17022@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHWCVWJKiQxBBR43A3beG9f7dEw4JpkFGZ6V-Es8EAn0uW3WJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:21:29PM +0100, Joe Sylve wrote:
> That makes sense and I agree, it's better to fix it now so that it
> will be easier to add 16K paging later (on a side note is there any
> reason not to add it now if someone was willing to do the work?).
See another thread with the Samsung folks about the adding 4-levels of
page tables. We need a bit of refactoring first to decouple the page
size from the number of levels, after that 16K would be relatively easy
(it's easy now as well but I don't see the point on doing it before the
refactoring).
> There was talk in another thread about the possibility of adding a
> pagetable-4K-hwdef.h and pagetable-64K-hwdef.h. I think this is
> another example of why that might be a good idea as this stuff could
> be moved out of proc.S as to be bit more clean:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
> +#define TCR_TG_FLAGS TCR_TG0_64K | TCR_TG1_64K
> +#else
> +#define TCR_TG_FLAGS TCR_TG0_4K | TCR_TG1_4K
> +#endif
Yes, we could do this when we create the pgtable-*k-hwdef.h files.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-02 4:00 [PATCH 1/1] AArch64: TCR_TG1_64K incorrectly sets TCR_EL1 bits [31:30] Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 4:00 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 12:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-02 12:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-02 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-02 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-02 17:21 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 17:21 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-03 8:58 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-04-03 8:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-04-02 21:44 ` Joe Perches
2014-04-02 21:44 ` Joe Perches
2014-04-02 22:10 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 22:10 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 22:16 ` Joe Perches
2014-04-02 22:16 ` Joe Perches
2014-04-02 23:01 ` Joe Sylve
2014-04-02 23:01 ` Joe Sylve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140403085835.GC17022@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.