From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gorcunov@openvz.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [rfc 0/3] Cleaning up soft-dirty bit usage
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 22:48:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403184844.260532690@openvz.org> (raw)
Hi! I've been trying to clean up soft-dirty bit usage. I can't cleanup
"ridiculous macros in pgtable-2level.h" completely because I need to
define _PAGE_FILE,_PAGE_PROTNONE,_PAGE_NUMA bits in sequence manner
like
#define _PAGE_BIT_FILE (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 1) /* _PAGE_BIT_RW */
#define _PAGE_BIT_NUMA (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 2) /* _PAGE_BIT_USER */
#define _PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 3) /* _PAGE_BIT_PWT */
which can't be done right now because numa code needs to save original
pte bits for example in __split_huge_page_map, if I'm not missing something
obvious.
Also if we ever redefine the bits above we will need to update PAT code
which uses _PAGE_GLOBAL + _PAGE_PRESENT to make pte_present return true
or false.
Another weird thing I found is the following sequence:
mprotect_fixup
change_protection (passes @prot_numa = 0 which finally ends up in)
...
change_pte_range(..., prot_numa)
if (!prot_numa) {
...
} else {
... this seems to be dead code branch ...
}
is it intentional, and @prot_numa argument is supposed to be passed
with prot_numa = 1 one day, or it's leftover from old times?
Note I've not yet tested the series building it now, hopefully finish
testing in a couple of hours.
Linus, by saying "define the bits we use when PAGE_PRESENT==0 separately
and explicitly" you meant complete rework of the bits, right? Not simply
group them in once place in a header?
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gorcunov@openvz.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [rfc 0/3] Cleaning up soft-dirty bit usage
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 22:48:44 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140403184844.260532690@openvz.org> (raw)
Hi! I've been trying to clean up soft-dirty bit usage. I can't cleanup
"ridiculous macros in pgtable-2level.h" completely because I need to
define _PAGE_FILE,_PAGE_PROTNONE,_PAGE_NUMA bits in sequence manner
like
#define _PAGE_BIT_FILE (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 1) /* _PAGE_BIT_RW */
#define _PAGE_BIT_NUMA (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 2) /* _PAGE_BIT_USER */
#define _PAGE_BIT_PROTNONE (_PAGE_BIT_PRESENT + 3) /* _PAGE_BIT_PWT */
which can't be done right now because numa code needs to save original
pte bits for example in __split_huge_page_map, if I'm not missing something
obvious.
Also if we ever redefine the bits above we will need to update PAT code
which uses _PAGE_GLOBAL + _PAGE_PRESENT to make pte_present return true
or false.
Another weird thing I found is the following sequence:
mprotect_fixup
change_protection (passes @prot_numa = 0 which finally ends up in)
...
change_pte_range(..., prot_numa)
if (!prot_numa) {
...
} else {
... this seems to be dead code branch ...
}
is it intentional, and @prot_numa argument is supposed to be passed
with prot_numa = 1 one day, or it's leftover from old times?
Note I've not yet tested the series building it now, hopefully finish
testing in a couple of hours.
Linus, by saying "define the bits we use when PAGE_PRESENT==0 separately
and explicitly" you meant complete rework of the bits, right? Not simply
group them in once place in a header?
Cyrill
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 18:48 Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2014-04-03 18:48 ` [rfc 0/3] Cleaning up soft-dirty bit usage Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` [rfc 1/3] mm: pgtable -- Drop unneeded preprocessor ifdef Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` [rfc 2/3] mm: pgtable -- Require X86_64 for soft-dirty tracker Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` [rfc 3/3] mm: pgtable -- Use _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY for swap entries Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-03 18:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-07 13:07 ` [rfc 0/3] Cleaning up soft-dirty bit usage Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-04-07 13:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2014-04-07 13:24 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140403184844.260532690@openvz.org \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.