From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 11:44:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140404094433.GA4275@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140404083328.GE6769@breakpoint.cc>
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 10:33:28AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:08:38PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > bitmask types default to flagcmp now, thus do not suppress OP_EQ. Else,
> > >
> > > rule filter output tcp flags syn
> > > rule filter output tcp flags == syn
> > >
> > > are both displayed as 'flags syn'.
> >
> > I believe that in other selectors:
> >
> > selector == value
> > selector value
> >
> > are equivalent.
>
> Yes, thats true.
>
> > I think it's not just that we have to fix the printing, but make it
> > consistent.
>
> Not sure, this was changed recently, see
> 6bad82aba5d304c7a2dd1b19fe57464dca327f4a
> (evaluate: use flagcmp for single RHS bitmask expression).
That change is fine, I think we only have to fix tcp flags == syn to
make it equivalent to tcp flags syn. I don't find a good reason why
the should behave in a different way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 22:08 [PATCH nft] expr: do not suppress OP_EQ when RHS is bitmask type Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 8:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 8:33 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 9:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2014-04-04 12:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-04-04 14:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 14:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2014-04-04 15:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-04-04 15:39 ` Florian Westphal
2014-04-04 12:07 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140404094433.GA4275@localhost \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.