From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn()
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 20:51:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140404185116.GA14715@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140404185038.GA14679@redhat.com>
No functional changes, preparation.
Shift the code from prepare_fixups() to arch_uprobe_analyze_insn()
with the following modifications:
- Do not call insn_get_opcode() again, it was already called
by validate_insn_bits().
- Move "case 0xea" up. This way "case 0xff" can fall through
to default case.
- change "case 0xff" to use the nested "switch (MODRM_REG)",
this way the code looks a bit simpler.
- Make the comments look consistent.
While at it, kill the initialization of rip_rela_target_address and
->fixups, we can rely on kzalloc(). We will add the new members into
arch_uprobe, it would be better to assume that everything is zero by
default.
TODO: cleanup/fix the mess in validate_insn_bits() paths:
- validate_insn_64bits() and validate_insn_32bits() should be
unified.
- "ifdef" is not used consistently; if good_insns_64 depends
on CONFIG_X86_64, then probably good_insns_32 should depend
on CONFIG_X86_32/EMULATION
- the usage of mm->context.ia32_compat looks wrong if the task
is TIF_X32.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 2ed8459..098e56e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
#define OPCODE1(insn) ((insn)->opcode.bytes[0])
#define OPCODE2(insn) ((insn)->opcode.bytes[1])
#define OPCODE3(insn) ((insn)->opcode.bytes[2])
-#define MODRM_REG(insn) X86_MODRM_REG(insn->modrm.value)
+#define MODRM_REG(insn) X86_MODRM_REG((insn)->modrm.value)
#define W(row, b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7, b8, b9, ba, bb, bc, bd, be, bf)\
(((b0##UL << 0x0)|(b1##UL << 0x1)|(b2##UL << 0x2)|(b3##UL << 0x3) | \
@@ -229,63 +229,6 @@ static int validate_insn_32bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
-/*
- * Figure out which fixups arch_uprobe_post_xol() will need to perform, and
- * annotate arch_uprobe->fixups accordingly. To start with,
- * arch_uprobe->fixups is either zero or it reflects rip-related fixups.
- */
-static void prepare_fixups(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
-{
- bool fix_ip = true, fix_call = false; /* defaults */
- int reg;
-
- insn_get_opcode(insn); /* should be a nop */
-
- switch (OPCODE1(insn)) {
- case 0x9d:
- /* popf */
- auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_SETF;
- break;
- case 0xc3: /* ret/lret */
- case 0xcb:
- case 0xc2:
- case 0xca:
- /* ip is correct */
- fix_ip = false;
- break;
- case 0xe8: /* call relative - Fix return addr */
- fix_call = true;
- break;
- case 0x9a: /* call absolute - Fix return addr, not ip */
- fix_call = true;
- fix_ip = false;
- break;
- case 0xff:
- insn_get_modrm(insn);
- reg = MODRM_REG(insn);
- if (reg == 2 || reg == 3) {
- /* call or lcall, indirect */
- /* Fix return addr; ip is correct. */
- fix_call = true;
- fix_ip = false;
- } else if (reg == 4 || reg == 5) {
- /* jmp or ljmp, indirect */
- /* ip is correct. */
- fix_ip = false;
- }
- break;
- case 0xea: /* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */
- fix_ip = false;
- break;
- default:
- break;
- }
- if (fix_ip)
- auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_IP;
- if (fix_call)
- auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_CALL;
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/*
* If arch_uprobe->insn doesn't use rip-relative addressing, return
@@ -318,7 +261,6 @@ handle_riprel_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, struct ins
if (mm->context.ia32_compat)
return;
- auprobe->rip_rela_target_address = 0x0;
if (!insn_rip_relative(insn))
return;
@@ -421,16 +363,58 @@ static int validate_insn_bits(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
*/
int arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
- int ret;
struct insn insn;
+ bool fix_ip = true, fix_call = false;
+ int ret;
- auprobe->fixups = 0;
ret = validate_insn_bits(auprobe, mm, &insn);
- if (ret != 0)
+ if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * Figure out which fixups arch_uprobe_post_xol() will need to perform,
+ * and annotate arch_uprobe->fixups accordingly. To start with, ->fixups
+ * is either zero or it reflects rip-related fixups.
+ */
handle_riprel_insn(auprobe, mm, &insn);
- prepare_fixups(auprobe, &insn);
+
+ switch (OPCODE1(&insn)) {
+ case 0x9d: /* popf */
+ auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_SETF;
+ break;
+ case 0xc3: /* ret or lret -- ip is correct */
+ case 0xcb:
+ case 0xc2:
+ case 0xca:
+ fix_ip = false;
+ break;
+ case 0xe8: /* call relative - Fix return addr */
+ fix_call = true;
+ break;
+ case 0x9a: /* call absolute - Fix return addr, not ip */
+ fix_call = true;
+ fix_ip = false;
+ break;
+ case 0xea: /* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */
+ fix_ip = false;
+ break;
+ case 0xff:
+ insn_get_modrm(&insn);
+ switch (MODRM_REG(&insn)) {
+ case 2: case 3: /* call or lcall, indirect */
+ fix_call = true;
+ case 4: case 5: /* jmp or ljmp, indirect */
+ fix_ip = false;
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (fix_ip)
+ auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_IP;
+ if (fix_call)
+ auprobe->fixups |= UPROBE_FIX_CALL;
return 0;
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-04 18:50 [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 9:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 12:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-09 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 13:58 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 18:51 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 21:56 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-05 12:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] uprobes/x86: preparations to fix the reprel jmp/call handling Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 19:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-04 23:44 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 20:36 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 20:34 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-07 20:42 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:26 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 21:25 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 4:05 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 13:41 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:57 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-11 3:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11 12:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-18 15:17 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-11 2:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-11 1:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 14:30 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 17:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 5:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-14 12:24 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-14 14:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 22:53 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-06 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 23:07 ` Jim Keniston
2014-04-09 16:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-07 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-08 11:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-08 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-08 19:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional rip-relative jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative call's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:53 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-10 13:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-04-10 13:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "short" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-09 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] uprobes/x86: Emulate rip-relative conditional "near" jmp's Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-10 12:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-04-09 21:34 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] uprobes/x86: fix the reprel jmp/call handling Jim Keniston
2014-04-10 12:28 ` Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140404185116.GA14715@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jlebon@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.