All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mauro Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] time: Fix truncation in jiffies_to_usecs()
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 20:56:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140408185609.GA14519@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140408141543.2de9449d@gandalf.local.home>

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:15:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:49:51 +0200
> Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:34:51PM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > c) If not this ... then what? Separate routine to convert large numbers
> > > >    of jiffies to usec/nsecs?  Should we make the existing one barf when
> > > >    handed a number that overflows?
> > > 
> > > Having thought about this a bit more - I'm leaning towards leaving
> > > jiffies_to_usecs() alone, but using it as a model for a from-scratch
> > > implementation of:
> > > u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> > > {
> > > }
> > > 
> > > This is what the uptime tracer actually needs - and there is only
> > > one user of jiffies_to_nsecs() to worry about.
> > 
> > I'm not sure I get what you're trying to do. We already have jiffies_to_nsecs().
> > Anyway I'll just wait and check out the next patch :)
> 
> I believe the issue is the way it's implemented:
> 
> static inline u64 jiffies_to_nsecs(const unsigned long j)
> {
> 	return (u64)jiffies_to_usecs(j) * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> }
> 
> The problem is with jiffies_to_usecs(). Which we probably should
> change.
> 
> With HZ = 100,
> 1 second jiffies_to_usecs(100) = 1000,000.
> 1 minute jiffies_to_usec(6000) = 60,000,000.
> 1 hour jiffies_to_usecs(360000) = 3,600,000,000
> 1 hour 11 minutes 35 seconds -
>     jiffies_to_usecs(429500) = 4,295,000,000
> 
> 2^32 = 4294967296  <  4,295,000,000
> 
> Overflow!
> 
> That means after 1 hour, 11 minutes and 35 seconds, jiffies_to_usecs()
> will return a reset number. Time will go backwards. It doesn't matter
> what you typecast the return value of jiffies_to_usecs() to, the result
> is wrong.

Ah! Ok got it now.
 
> Actually, I like Tony's first patch. I really think jiffies_to_usecs()
> should return a u64 number.

Agreed it's way too error-prone. OTOH there are too many users to allow such a blind
broad conversion of its return type:

    $ git grep jiffies_to_usecs | cut -f1 | wc -l
    52

So it may indeed be a better idea to first create a standalone jiffies_to_nsecs().
It can then be used to deprecate and replace most (if not all) calls to jiffies_to_usecs()
altogether. Just the conversion must be made one by one to make sure that users can
handle that.

Of course a big fat comment on jiffies_to_usecs() to describe that it's unsafe
and deprecated would help a bit.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-08 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-07 22:25 [RFC PATCH] time: Fix truncation in jiffies_to_usecs() Tony Luck
2014-04-08  5:34 ` Tony Luck
2014-04-08 15:27   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 17:49   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-04-08 18:15     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 18:56       ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-04-08 19:34         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-08 17:32           ` [PATCH] time: Provide full featured jiffies_to_nsecs() function Tony Luck
2014-04-09 16:53             ` Tony Luck
2014-05-09 21:46               ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-16 14:24             ` Shy Shuky
2014-05-16 17:17               ` Luck, Tony
2014-05-16 19:02                 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-19  1:28             ` Xie XiuQi
2014-05-19 22:35               ` Luck, Tony
2014-06-28 11:56                 ` Xie XiuQi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140408185609.GA14519@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.