All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:09:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409150923.GS16119@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409150448.GX29751@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:04:48PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:54:16PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > On 13 December 2013 12:39, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > I see what's causing this: the kuser helpers are using "bx lr" to return
> > > which will be undefined on non-Thumb CPUs.  We generally cope fine with
> > > non-Thumb CPUs, conditionalising where necessary on HWCAP_THUMB or the
> > > T bit in the PSR being set.
> > >
> > > However, it looks like the kuser helpers got missed.  As a check, please
> > > look at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S, find the line with:
> > >
> > >         .macro  usr_ret, reg
> > >
> > > and ensure that the mov pc, \reg case always gets used.  Please report
> > > back.
> > 
> > Uwe and Arnd came up with a solution except it doesn't work when I test it.
> > 
> > The suggested patch is:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > index 1879e8d..de15bfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > @@ -739,6 +739,18 @@ ENDPROC(__switch_to)
> > 
> >         .macro  usr_ret, reg
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_THUMB
> > +       /*
> > +        * Having CONFIG_ARM_THUMB isn't a guarantee that the cpu has support
> > +        * for Thumb and so the bx instruction. Use a mov if the address to
> > +        * jump to is 32 bit aligned. (Note that this code is compiled in ARM
> > +        * mode, so this is the right test.)
> > +        */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v4)
> > +       tst     \reg, #3
> > +       moveq   pc, \reg
> > +       b       .
> > +#endif
> > +
> >         bx      \reg
> >  #else
> >         mov     pc, \reg
> > 
> > 
> > With this applied, and the following two possibilities in next-20140403:
> > 
> > [1] ARCH_MULTI_V4 only (no CONFIG_ARM_THUMB)
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4=y
> > 
> > [2] ARCH_MULTI_V4 and ARCH_MULTI_V4T
> >      CONFIG_ARM_THUMB=y
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4=y
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4T=y
> > 
> > 
> > Booting a kernel with either option [1] or [2] yield the following results:
> > 
> > [1] works
> > [2] hangs after "[    2.730000] Freeing unused kernel memory: 104K
> > (c02f5000 - c030f000)"
> > 
> > 
> > Any help why the moveq doesn't work would be much appreciated.
> doing s/moveq/mov/ does the trick on the machine in question, but this
> is obviously not an option for mainline. But it means that even on this
> non-Thumb capable machine \reg contains an address that is not aligned.
> 
> Where does \reg come from? Is it provided by userspace? If so, is it a
> userspace bug?

Well, in case (2), if usr_ret is returning to a caller running thumb code,
it will lock up - because the register will not be aligned, so moveq will
fail, and the next instruction is a branch which only ever branches to
itself.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@gmail.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"arm@kernel.org" <arm@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ulli.kroll@googlemail.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:09:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409150923.GS16119@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409150448.GX29751@pengutronix.de>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:04:48PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:54:16PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> > On 13 December 2013 12:39, Russell King - ARM Linux
> > <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > I see what's causing this: the kuser helpers are using "bx lr" to return
> > > which will be undefined on non-Thumb CPUs.  We generally cope fine with
> > > non-Thumb CPUs, conditionalising where necessary on HWCAP_THUMB or the
> > > T bit in the PSR being set.
> > >
> > > However, it looks like the kuser helpers got missed.  As a check, please
> > > look at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S, find the line with:
> > >
> > >         .macro  usr_ret, reg
> > >
> > > and ensure that the mov pc, \reg case always gets used.  Please report
> > > back.
> > 
> > Uwe and Arnd came up with a solution except it doesn't work when I test it.
> > 
> > The suggested patch is:
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > index 1879e8d..de15bfd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> > @@ -739,6 +739,18 @@ ENDPROC(__switch_to)
> > 
> >         .macro  usr_ret, reg
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_THUMB
> > +       /*
> > +        * Having CONFIG_ARM_THUMB isn't a guarantee that the cpu has support
> > +        * for Thumb and so the bx instruction. Use a mov if the address to
> > +        * jump to is 32 bit aligned. (Note that this code is compiled in ARM
> > +        * mode, so this is the right test.)
> > +        */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_32v4)
> > +       tst     \reg, #3
> > +       moveq   pc, \reg
> > +       b       .
> > +#endif
> > +
> >         bx      \reg
> >  #else
> >         mov     pc, \reg
> > 
> > 
> > With this applied, and the following two possibilities in next-20140403:
> > 
> > [1] ARCH_MULTI_V4 only (no CONFIG_ARM_THUMB)
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4=y
> > 
> > [2] ARCH_MULTI_V4 and ARCH_MULTI_V4T
> >      CONFIG_ARM_THUMB=y
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4=y
> >      CONFIG_CPU_32v4T=y
> > 
> > 
> > Booting a kernel with either option [1] or [2] yield the following results:
> > 
> > [1] works
> > [2] hangs after "[    2.730000] Freeing unused kernel memory: 104K
> > (c02f5000 - c030f000)"
> > 
> > 
> > Any help why the moveq doesn't work would be much appreciated.
> doing s/moveq/mov/ does the trick on the machine in question, but this
> is obviously not an option for mainline. But it means that even on this
> non-Thumb capable machine \reg contains an address that is not aligned.
> 
> Where does \reg come from? Is it provided by userspace? If so, is it a
> userspace bug?

Well, in case (2), if usr_ret is returning to a caller running thumb code,
it will lock up - because the register will not be aligned, so moveq will
fail, and the next instruction is a branch which only ever branches to
itself.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-09 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-13  8:09 [PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13  8:09 ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13  9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13  9:56   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13 10:51   ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 10:51     ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 11:39     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13 11:39       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-12-13 13:33       ` Jonas Jensen
2013-12-13 13:33         ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-09 14:54       ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-09 14:54         ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-09 15:04         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-04-09 15:04           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-04-09 15:09           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-04-09 15:09             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:06         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:06           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:13           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-04-09 15:13             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-04-09 15:27             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:27               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 15:50               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-09 15:50                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-09 16:01                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-09 16:01                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-10  8:04                   ` Jonas Jensen
2014-04-10  8:04                     ` Jonas Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140409150923.GS16119@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.