From: Henrik Austad <henrik-RT+80VE2nyv1P9xLtpHBDw@public.gmane.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
darren-P76s1CtE8BHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
johan.eker-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
p.faure-et3tyl94nDNyDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org,
Linux Kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
claudio-YOzL5CV4y4YG1A2ADO40+w@public.gmane.org,
michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
tommaso.cucinotta-gAmJrWFzCps@public.gmane.org,
juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
nicola.manica-+cHZLFJ93xAO91npARCAeA@public.gmane.org,
luca.abeni-3IIOeSMMxS4@public.gmane.org,
dhaval.giani-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
hgu1972-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
Paul McKenney
<paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
insop.song-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
liming.wang-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org,
jkacur-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: sched_{set,get}attr() manpage
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409151911.GA4041@austad.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409092510.GQ11096-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:20:29PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > If your could take another pass though your existing text, to incorporate the
> > new flags stuff, and then send a page to me + linux-man@
> > that would be great.
>
>
> Sorry, this slipped my mind. An updated version below. Heavy borrowing
> from SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) as before.
>
> ---
>
> NAME
> sched_setattr, sched_getattr - set and get scheduling policy/attributes
>
> SYNOPSIS
> #include <sched.h>
>
> struct sched_attr {
> u32 size;
> u32 sched_policy;
> u64 sched_flags;
>
> /* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
> s32 sched_nice;
> /* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
> u32 sched_priority;
> /* SCHED_DEADLINE */
> u64 sched_runtime;
> u64 sched_deadline;
> u64 sched_period;
> };
> int sched_setattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int flags);
>
> int sched_getattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int size, unsigned int flags);
>
> DESCRIPTION
> sched_setattr() sets both the scheduling policy and the
> associated attributes for the process whose ID is specified in
> pid. If pid equals zero, the scheduling policy and attributes
> of the calling process will be set. The interpretation of the
> argument attr depends on the selected policy. Currently, Linux
> supports the following "normal" (i.e., non-real-time) scheduling
> policies:
>
> SCHED_OTHER the standard "fair" time-sharing policy;
>
> SCHED_BATCH for "batch" style execution of processes; and
>
> SCHED_IDLE for running very low priority background jobs.
>
> The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for
why the "'s?
> special time-critical applications that need precise control
> over the way in which runnable processes are selected for
> execution:
>
> SCHED_FIFO a first-in, first-out policy;
>
> SCHED_RR a round-robin policy; and
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE a deadline policy.
>
> The semantics of each of these policies are detailed below.
>
> sched_attr::size must be set to the size of the structure, as in
> sizeof(struct sched_attr), if the provided structure is smaller
> than the kernel structure, any additional fields are assumed
> '0'. If the provided structure is larger than the kernel
> structure, the kernel verifies all additional fields are '0' if
> not the syscall will fail with -E2BIG.
>
> sched_attr::sched_policy the desired scheduling policy.
>
> sched_attr::sched_flags additional flags that can influence
> scheduling behaviour. Currently as per Linux kernel 3.14:
>
> SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK - resets the scheduling policy
> to: (struct sched_attr){ .sched_policy = SCHED_OTHER, }
> on fork().
>
> is the only supported flag.
>
> sched_attr::sched_nice should only be set for SCHED_OTHER,
> SCHED_BATCH, the desired nice value [-20,19], see NICE(2).
>
> sched_attr::sched_priority should only be set for SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR, the desired static priority [1,99].
>
> sched_attr::sched_runtime
> sched_attr::sched_deadline
> sched_attr::sched_period should only be set for SCHED_DEADLINE
> and are the traditional sporadic task model parameters.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.
>
> sched_getattr() queries the scheduling policy currently applied
> to the process identified by pid. If pid equals zero, the
> policy of the calling process will be retrieved.
>
> The size argument should reflect the size of struct sched_attr
> as known to userspace. The kernel fills out sched_attr::size to
> the size of its sched_attr structure. If the user provided
> structure is larger, additional fields are not touched. If the
> user provided structure is smaller, but the kernel needs to
> return values outside the provided space, the syscall will fail
> with -E2BIG.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.
What about SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FOR?
> The other sched_attr fields are filled out as described in
> sched_setattr().
>
> Scheduling Policies
> The scheduler is the kernel component that decides which runnable
> process will be executed by the CPU next. Each process has an associ‐
> ated scheduling policy and a static scheduling priority, sched_prior‐
> ity; these are the settings that are modified by sched_setscheduler().
> The scheduler makes it decisions based on knowledge of the scheduling
> policy and static priority of all processes on the system.
Isn't this last sentence redundant/sliglhtly repetitive?
> For processes scheduled under one of the normal scheduling policies
> (SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_IDLE, SCHED_BATCH), sched_priority is not used in
> scheduling decisions (it must be specified as 0).
>
> Processes scheduled under one of the real-time policies (SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR) have a sched_priority value in the range 1 (low) to 99
> (high). (As the numbers imply, real-time processes always have higher
> priority than normal processes.) Note well: POSIX.1-2001 only requires
> an implementation to support a minimum 32 distinct priority levels for
> the real-time policies, and some systems supply just this minimum.
> Portable programs should use sched_get_priority_min(2) and
> sched_get_priority_max(2) to find the range of priorities supported for
> a particular policy.
>
> Conceptually, the scheduler maintains a list of runnable processes for
> each possible sched_priority value. In order to determine which
> process runs next, the scheduler looks for the nonempty list with the
> highest static priority and selects the process at the head of this
> list.
>
> A process's scheduling policy determines where it will be inserted into
> the list of processes with equal static priority and how it will move
> inside this list.
>
> All scheduling is preemptive: if a process with a higher static prior‐
> ity becomes ready to run, the currently running process will be pre‐
> empted and returned to the wait list for its static priority level.
> The scheduling policy only determines the ordering within the list of
> runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE: Sporadic task model deadline scheduling
> SCHED_DEADLINE is an implementation of GEDF (Global Earliest
> Deadline First) with additional CBS (Constant Bandwidth Server).
> The CBS guarantees that tasks that over-run their specified
> budget are throttled and do not affect the correct performance
> of other SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE tasks will fail FORK(2) with -EAGAIN
>
> Setting SCHED_DEADLINE can fail with -EINVAL when admission
> control tests fail.
Perhaps add a note about the deadline-class having higher priority than the
other classes; i.e. if a deadline-task is runnable, it will preempt any
other SCHED_(RR|FIFO) regardless of priority?
> SCHED_FIFO: First In-First Out scheduling
> SCHED_FIFO can only be used with static priorities higher than 0, which
> means that when a SCHED_FIFO processes becomes runnable, it will always
> immediately preempt any currently running SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_BATCH, or
> SCHED_IDLE process. SCHED_FIFO is a simple scheduling algorithm with‐
> out time slicing. For processes scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO policy,
> the following rules apply:
>
> * A SCHED_FIFO process that has been preempted by another process of
> higher priority will stay at the head of the list for its priority
> and will resume execution as soon as all processes of higher prior‐
> ity are blocked again.
>
> * When a SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable, it will be inserted at
> the end of the list for its priority.
>
> * A call to sched_setscheduler() or sched_setparam(2) will put the
> SCHED_FIFO (or SCHED_RR) process identified by pid at the start of
> the list if it was runnable. As a consequence, it may preempt the
> currently running process if it has the same priority.
> (POSIX.1-2001 specifies that the process should go to the end of the
> list.)
>
> * A process calling sched_yield(2) will be put at the end of the list.
How about the recent discussion regarding sched_yield(). Is this correct?
lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1403312333100.14882-3cz04HxQygjZikZi3RtOZ2GXanvQGlWp@public.gmane.orgnix.de
Is this the correct place to add a note explaining te potentional pitfalls
using sched_yield?
> No other events will move a process scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO pol‐
> icy in the wait list of runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> A SCHED_FIFO process runs until either it is blocked by an I/O request,
> it is preempted by a higher priority process, or it calls
> sched_yield(2).
>
> SCHED_RR: Round Robin scheduling
> SCHED_RR is a simple enhancement of SCHED_FIFO. Everything described
> above for SCHED_FIFO also applies to SCHED_RR, except that each process
> is only allowed to run for a maximum time quantum. If a SCHED_RR
> process has been running for a time period equal to or longer than the
> time quantum, it will be put at the end of the list for its priority.
> A SCHED_RR process that has been preempted by a higher priority process
> and subsequently resumes execution as a running process will complete
> the unexpired portion of its round robin time quantum. The length of
> the time quantum can be retrieved using sched_rr_get_interval(2).
-> Default is 0.1HZ ms
This is a question I get form time to time, having this in the manpage
would be helpful.
> SCHED_OTHER: Default Linux time-sharing scheduling
> SCHED_OTHER can only be used at static priority 0. SCHED_OTHER is the
> standard Linux time-sharing scheduler that is intended for all pro‐
> cesses that do not require the special real-time mechanisms. The
> process to run is chosen from the static priority 0 list based on a
> dynamic priority that is determined only inside this list. The dynamic
> priority is based on the nice value (set by nice(2) or setpriority(2))
> and increased for each time quantum the process is ready to run, but
> denied to run by the scheduler. This ensures fair progress among all
> SCHED_OTHER processes.
>
> SCHED_BATCH: Scheduling batch processes
> (Since Linux 2.6.16.) SCHED_BATCH can only be used at static priority
> 0. This policy is similar to SCHED_OTHER in that it schedules the
> process according to its dynamic priority (based on the nice value).
> The difference is that this policy will cause the scheduler to always
> assume that the process is CPU-intensive. Consequently, the scheduler
> will apply a small scheduling penalty with respect to wakeup behaviour,
> so that this process is mildly disfavored in scheduling decisions.
>
> This policy is useful for workloads that are noninteractive, but do not
> want to lower their nice value, and for workloads that want a determin‐
> istic scheduling policy without interactivity causing extra preemptions
> (between the workload's tasks).
>
> SCHED_IDLE: Scheduling very low priority jobs
> (Since Linux 2.6.23.) SCHED_IDLE can only be used at static priority
> 0; the process nice value has no influence for this policy.
>
> This policy is intended for running jobs at extremely low priority
> (lower even than a +19 nice value with the SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH
> policies).
>
> RETURN VALUE
> On success, sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() return 0. On
> error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
>
> ERRORS
> EINVAL The scheduling policy is not one of the recognized policies,
> param is NULL, or param does not make sense for the policy.
>
> EPERM The calling process does not have appropriate privileges.
>
> ESRCH The process whose ID is pid could not be found.
>
> E2BIG The provided storage for struct sched_attr is either too
> big, see sched_setattr(), or too small, see sched_getattr().
Where's the EBUSY? It can throw this from __sched_setscheduler() when it
checks if there's enough bandwidth to run the task.
>
> NOTES
> While the text above (and in SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2)) talks about
> processes, in actual fact these system calls are thread specific.
--
Henrik Austad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com,
p.faure@akatech.ch, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com,
fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it,
juri.lelli@gmail.com, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com,
jkacur@redhat.com, linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sched_{set,get}attr() manpage
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:19:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140409151911.GA4041@austad.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140409092510.GQ11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 02:20:29PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > If your could take another pass though your existing text, to incorporate the
> > new flags stuff, and then send a page to me + linux-man@
> > that would be great.
>
>
> Sorry, this slipped my mind. An updated version below. Heavy borrowing
> from SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2) as before.
>
> ---
>
> NAME
> sched_setattr, sched_getattr - set and get scheduling policy/attributes
>
> SYNOPSIS
> #include <sched.h>
>
> struct sched_attr {
> u32 size;
> u32 sched_policy;
> u64 sched_flags;
>
> /* SCHED_NORMAL, SCHED_BATCH */
> s32 sched_nice;
> /* SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR */
> u32 sched_priority;
> /* SCHED_DEADLINE */
> u64 sched_runtime;
> u64 sched_deadline;
> u64 sched_period;
> };
> int sched_setattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int flags);
>
> int sched_getattr(pid_t pid, const struct sched_attr *attr, unsigned int size, unsigned int flags);
>
> DESCRIPTION
> sched_setattr() sets both the scheduling policy and the
> associated attributes for the process whose ID is specified in
> pid. If pid equals zero, the scheduling policy and attributes
> of the calling process will be set. The interpretation of the
> argument attr depends on the selected policy. Currently, Linux
> supports the following "normal" (i.e., non-real-time) scheduling
> policies:
>
> SCHED_OTHER the standard "fair" time-sharing policy;
>
> SCHED_BATCH for "batch" style execution of processes; and
>
> SCHED_IDLE for running very low priority background jobs.
>
> The following "real-time" policies are also supported, for
why the "'s?
> special time-critical applications that need precise control
> over the way in which runnable processes are selected for
> execution:
>
> SCHED_FIFO a first-in, first-out policy;
>
> SCHED_RR a round-robin policy; and
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE a deadline policy.
>
> The semantics of each of these policies are detailed below.
>
> sched_attr::size must be set to the size of the structure, as in
> sizeof(struct sched_attr), if the provided structure is smaller
> than the kernel structure, any additional fields are assumed
> '0'. If the provided structure is larger than the kernel
> structure, the kernel verifies all additional fields are '0' if
> not the syscall will fail with -E2BIG.
>
> sched_attr::sched_policy the desired scheduling policy.
>
> sched_attr::sched_flags additional flags that can influence
> scheduling behaviour. Currently as per Linux kernel 3.14:
>
> SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FORK - resets the scheduling policy
> to: (struct sched_attr){ .sched_policy = SCHED_OTHER, }
> on fork().
>
> is the only supported flag.
>
> sched_attr::sched_nice should only be set for SCHED_OTHER,
> SCHED_BATCH, the desired nice value [-20,19], see NICE(2).
>
> sched_attr::sched_priority should only be set for SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR, the desired static priority [1,99].
>
> sched_attr::sched_runtime
> sched_attr::sched_deadline
> sched_attr::sched_period should only be set for SCHED_DEADLINE
> and are the traditional sporadic task model parameters.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.
>
> sched_getattr() queries the scheduling policy currently applied
> to the process identified by pid. If pid equals zero, the
> policy of the calling process will be retrieved.
>
> The size argument should reflect the size of struct sched_attr
> as known to userspace. The kernel fills out sched_attr::size to
> the size of its sched_attr structure. If the user provided
> structure is larger, additional fields are not touched. If the
> user provided structure is smaller, but the kernel needs to
> return values outside the provided space, the syscall will fail
> with -E2BIG.
>
> The flags argument should be 0.
What about SCHED_FLAG_RESET_ON_FOR?
> The other sched_attr fields are filled out as described in
> sched_setattr().
>
> Scheduling Policies
> The scheduler is the kernel component that decides which runnable
> process will be executed by the CPU next. Each process has an associ‐
> ated scheduling policy and a static scheduling priority, sched_prior‐
> ity; these are the settings that are modified by sched_setscheduler().
> The scheduler makes it decisions based on knowledge of the scheduling
> policy and static priority of all processes on the system.
Isn't this last sentence redundant/sliglhtly repetitive?
> For processes scheduled under one of the normal scheduling policies
> (SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_IDLE, SCHED_BATCH), sched_priority is not used in
> scheduling decisions (it must be specified as 0).
>
> Processes scheduled under one of the real-time policies (SCHED_FIFO,
> SCHED_RR) have a sched_priority value in the range 1 (low) to 99
> (high). (As the numbers imply, real-time processes always have higher
> priority than normal processes.) Note well: POSIX.1-2001 only requires
> an implementation to support a minimum 32 distinct priority levels for
> the real-time policies, and some systems supply just this minimum.
> Portable programs should use sched_get_priority_min(2) and
> sched_get_priority_max(2) to find the range of priorities supported for
> a particular policy.
>
> Conceptually, the scheduler maintains a list of runnable processes for
> each possible sched_priority value. In order to determine which
> process runs next, the scheduler looks for the nonempty list with the
> highest static priority and selects the process at the head of this
> list.
>
> A process's scheduling policy determines where it will be inserted into
> the list of processes with equal static priority and how it will move
> inside this list.
>
> All scheduling is preemptive: if a process with a higher static prior‐
> ity becomes ready to run, the currently running process will be pre‐
> empted and returned to the wait list for its static priority level.
> The scheduling policy only determines the ordering within the list of
> runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE: Sporadic task model deadline scheduling
> SCHED_DEADLINE is an implementation of GEDF (Global Earliest
> Deadline First) with additional CBS (Constant Bandwidth Server).
> The CBS guarantees that tasks that over-run their specified
> budget are throttled and do not affect the correct performance
> of other SCHED_DEADLINE tasks.
>
> SCHED_DEADLINE tasks will fail FORK(2) with -EAGAIN
>
> Setting SCHED_DEADLINE can fail with -EINVAL when admission
> control tests fail.
Perhaps add a note about the deadline-class having higher priority than the
other classes; i.e. if a deadline-task is runnable, it will preempt any
other SCHED_(RR|FIFO) regardless of priority?
> SCHED_FIFO: First In-First Out scheduling
> SCHED_FIFO can only be used with static priorities higher than 0, which
> means that when a SCHED_FIFO processes becomes runnable, it will always
> immediately preempt any currently running SCHED_OTHER, SCHED_BATCH, or
> SCHED_IDLE process. SCHED_FIFO is a simple scheduling algorithm with‐
> out time slicing. For processes scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO policy,
> the following rules apply:
>
> * A SCHED_FIFO process that has been preempted by another process of
> higher priority will stay at the head of the list for its priority
> and will resume execution as soon as all processes of higher prior‐
> ity are blocked again.
>
> * When a SCHED_FIFO process becomes runnable, it will be inserted at
> the end of the list for its priority.
>
> * A call to sched_setscheduler() or sched_setparam(2) will put the
> SCHED_FIFO (or SCHED_RR) process identified by pid at the start of
> the list if it was runnable. As a consequence, it may preempt the
> currently running process if it has the same priority.
> (POSIX.1-2001 specifies that the process should go to the end of the
> list.)
>
> * A process calling sched_yield(2) will be put at the end of the list.
How about the recent discussion regarding sched_yield(). Is this correct?
lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1403312333100.14882@ionos.tec.linutronix.de
Is this the correct place to add a note explaining te potentional pitfalls
using sched_yield?
> No other events will move a process scheduled under the SCHED_FIFO pol‐
> icy in the wait list of runnable processes with equal static priority.
>
> A SCHED_FIFO process runs until either it is blocked by an I/O request,
> it is preempted by a higher priority process, or it calls
> sched_yield(2).
>
> SCHED_RR: Round Robin scheduling
> SCHED_RR is a simple enhancement of SCHED_FIFO. Everything described
> above for SCHED_FIFO also applies to SCHED_RR, except that each process
> is only allowed to run for a maximum time quantum. If a SCHED_RR
> process has been running for a time period equal to or longer than the
> time quantum, it will be put at the end of the list for its priority.
> A SCHED_RR process that has been preempted by a higher priority process
> and subsequently resumes execution as a running process will complete
> the unexpired portion of its round robin time quantum. The length of
> the time quantum can be retrieved using sched_rr_get_interval(2).
-> Default is 0.1HZ ms
This is a question I get form time to time, having this in the manpage
would be helpful.
> SCHED_OTHER: Default Linux time-sharing scheduling
> SCHED_OTHER can only be used at static priority 0. SCHED_OTHER is the
> standard Linux time-sharing scheduler that is intended for all pro‐
> cesses that do not require the special real-time mechanisms. The
> process to run is chosen from the static priority 0 list based on a
> dynamic priority that is determined only inside this list. The dynamic
> priority is based on the nice value (set by nice(2) or setpriority(2))
> and increased for each time quantum the process is ready to run, but
> denied to run by the scheduler. This ensures fair progress among all
> SCHED_OTHER processes.
>
> SCHED_BATCH: Scheduling batch processes
> (Since Linux 2.6.16.) SCHED_BATCH can only be used at static priority
> 0. This policy is similar to SCHED_OTHER in that it schedules the
> process according to its dynamic priority (based on the nice value).
> The difference is that this policy will cause the scheduler to always
> assume that the process is CPU-intensive. Consequently, the scheduler
> will apply a small scheduling penalty with respect to wakeup behaviour,
> so that this process is mildly disfavored in scheduling decisions.
>
> This policy is useful for workloads that are noninteractive, but do not
> want to lower their nice value, and for workloads that want a determin‐
> istic scheduling policy without interactivity causing extra preemptions
> (between the workload's tasks).
>
> SCHED_IDLE: Scheduling very low priority jobs
> (Since Linux 2.6.23.) SCHED_IDLE can only be used at static priority
> 0; the process nice value has no influence for this policy.
>
> This policy is intended for running jobs at extremely low priority
> (lower even than a +19 nice value with the SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH
> policies).
>
> RETURN VALUE
> On success, sched_setattr() and sched_getattr() return 0. On
> error, -1 is returned, and errno is set appropriately.
>
> ERRORS
> EINVAL The scheduling policy is not one of the recognized policies,
> param is NULL, or param does not make sense for the policy.
>
> EPERM The calling process does not have appropriate privileges.
>
> ESRCH The process whose ID is pid could not be found.
>
> E2BIG The provided storage for struct sched_attr is either too
> big, see sched_setattr(), or too small, see sched_getattr().
Where's the EBUSY? It can throw this from __sched_setscheduler() when it
checks if there's enough bandwidth to run the task.
>
> NOTES
> While the text above (and in SCHED_SETSCHEDULER(2)) talks about
> processes, in actual fact these system calls are thread specific.
--
Henrik Austad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 12:27 [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 01/13] sched: Add 3 new scheduler syscalls to support an extended scheduling parameters ABI Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:36 ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-01-21 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-21 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 16:46 ` Juri Lelli
2014-02-14 14:13 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-02-14 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-15 12:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-17 13:20 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <53020C9D.1050208-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-09 9:25 ` sched_{set,get}attr() manpage Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140409092510.GQ11096-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-09 15:19 ` Henrik Austad [this message]
2014-04-09 15:19 ` Henrik Austad
[not found] ` <20140409151911.GA4041-RT+80VE2nyv1P9xLtpHBDw@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-09 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-09 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140409154204.GD10526-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-10 7:47 ` Juri Lelli
2014-04-10 7:47 ` Juri Lelli
2014-04-10 9:59 ` Claudio Scordino
2014-04-27 15:47 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-04-27 15:47 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <CAKgNAki5BkOyckf1zxJCRs2tq-eG9bWW_yRGi3hDynz12wz+QQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-27 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-27 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-27 19:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-27 19:45 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <20140427193449.GB17778-RM5+C6weyIYnLiPH7yDmwOa11wxjtiyuLtmvbW2Dspo@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-28 7:39 ` Juri Lelli
2014-04-28 7:39 ` Juri Lelli
2014-04-28 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-28 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140428081858.GX13658-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 13:08 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-04-29 13:08 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <535FA467.2070403-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-29 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-29 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-30 11:09 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <5360D9E5.9080206-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-30 12:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-30 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-30 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140430130937.GH30445-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-03 10:43 ` Juri Lelli
2014-05-03 10:43 ` Juri Lelli
[not found] ` <20140503124355.5d927080518051ca507bc381-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 6:55 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-05 6:55 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-05 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20140505072114.GY11096-ndre7Fmf5hadTX5a5knrm8zTDFooKrT+cvkQGrU6aU0@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 7:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-05 7:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <53674094.2020307-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 7:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-05 9:53 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-06 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 8:23 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
[not found] ` <536C907A.1040205-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-09 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-09 9:26 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-19 13:06 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Disallow sched_attr::sched_policy < 0 tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-22 12:25 ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-21 20:32 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Add 'flags' argument to sched_{set, get}attr() syscalls tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-26 9:48 ` [PATCH 01/13] sched: Add 3 new scheduler syscalls to support an extended scheduling parameters ABI Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 02/13] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE structures & implementation Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 03/13] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE SMP-related data structures & logic Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 04/13] [PATCH 05/13] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE avg_update accounting Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 05/13] sched: Add period support for -deadline tasks Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 06/13] [PATCH 07/13] sched: Add latency tracing " Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 07/13] rtmutex: Turn the plist into an rb-tree Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 08/13] sched: Drafted deadline inheritance logic Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 09/13] sched: Add bandwidth management for sched_dl Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 17:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-20 17:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 18:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-20 18:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-20 21:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 23:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-21 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-21 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-13 15:55 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/deadline: Fix hotplug admission control tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 10/13] sched: speed up -dl pushes with a push-heap Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 11/13] sched: Remove sched_setscheduler2() Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 12/13] sched, deadline: Fixup the smp-affinity mask tests Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 12:27 ` [PATCH 13/13] sched, deadline: Remove the sysctl_sched_dl knobs Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-17 20:17 ` [PATCH] sched, deadline: Properly initialize def_dl_bandwidth lock Steven Rostedt
2013-12-18 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 13:51 ` [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches Juri Lelli
2013-12-20 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-20 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-20 15:19 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140409151911.GA4041@austad.us \
--to=henrik-rt+80ve2nyv1p9xltphbdw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=claudio-YOzL5CV4y4YG1A2ADO40+w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=darren-P76s1CtE8BHQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dhaval.giani-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fchecconi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hgu1972-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=insop.song-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jkacur-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johan.eker-IzeFyvvaP7pWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=juri.lelli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=liming.wang-CWA4WttNNZF54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=luca.abeni-3IIOeSMMxS4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michael-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nicola.manica-+cHZLFJ93xAO91npARCAeA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=oleg-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=p.faure-et3tyl94nDNyDzI6CaY1VQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=raistlin-k2GhghHVRtY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rostedt-nx8X9YLhiw1AfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta-gAmJrWFzCps@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.