All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Wrong SPI NOR model detected by mx6sl
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404101807.48238.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DR00ea=zfr+eM0uh2L5a6QB93g8X48JNkXZZc4UavdZA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 at 05:49:18 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On the imx6sl-evk there is a m25p32 spi nor flash, but in the kernel
> probe we get:
> 
> m25p80 spi0.0: found mr25h256, expected m25p32
> m25p80 spi0.0: mr25h256 (32 Kbytes)
> 
> On the mx6qsabresd there is also a m25p32, which is correctly detected:
> m25p80 spi0.0: m25p32 (4096 Kbytes)
> 
> Any ideas as to why mx6sl detects the wrong spi nor model?

Can you share the JEDEC ID codes that both of the boards actually read from the 
SPI NOR ? You can dump those in the m25p80.c driver . That'd be helpful, I 
suspect some kind of an "offset" or "polarity inversion" in the SPI 
communication causing this.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Wrong SPI NOR model detected by mx6sl
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:07:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201404101807.48238.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5DR00ea=zfr+eM0uh2L5a6QB93g8X48JNkXZZc4UavdZA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 at 05:49:18 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On the imx6sl-evk there is a m25p32 spi nor flash, but in the kernel
> probe we get:
> 
> m25p80 spi0.0: found mr25h256, expected m25p32
> m25p80 spi0.0: mr25h256 (32 Kbytes)
> 
> On the mx6qsabresd there is also a m25p32, which is correctly detected:
> m25p80 spi0.0: m25p32 (4096 Kbytes)
> 
> Any ideas as to why mx6sl detects the wrong spi nor model?

Can you share the JEDEC ID codes that both of the boards actually read from the 
SPI NOR ? You can dump those in the m25p80.c driver . That'd be helpful, I 
suspect some kind of an "offset" or "polarity inversion" in the SPI 
communication causing this.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-10 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10 15:49 Wrong SPI NOR model detected by mx6sl Fabio Estevam
2014-04-10 15:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-10 16:07 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-04-10 16:07   ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-10 17:16   ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-10 17:16     ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11  0:26     ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-11  0:26       ` Huang Shijie
2014-04-11  2:09       ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11  2:09         ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11 11:43       ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11 11:43         ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11 11:59         ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-11 11:59           ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-11 12:11           ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11 12:11             ` Fabio Estevam
2014-04-11 12:16             ` Marek Vasut
2014-04-11 12:16               ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201404101807.48238.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=b32955@freescale.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.