From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>,
Harini Katakam <harinik-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Simek <michals-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence: Add dependency on ARCH_ZYNQ
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:26:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415162621.GO17408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140415094541.GL12304-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> > I sent the patch for it which solve this problem in generic way.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/42
>
> > Feel free to give me ACK for it.
>
> Will has been working on this too off and on, he was also trying to
> define some semantics for the relaxed versions. It'd be really good to
> address this properly, this is a constant source of make work.
Yes, I have a series adding relaxed accessors to all architectures (and
asm-generic) along with an attempt at defining some semantics. This came
about from discussion with BenH at the last kernel summit, I just didn't get
around to posting what we came up with.
I should be able to post something this week, but there's still an open
question relating to mmiowb() that I'd like the PPC guys to chime in on.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Harini Katakam <harinik@xilinx.com>,
"linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence: Add dependency on ARCH_ZYNQ
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:26:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140415162621.GO17408@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140415094541.GL12304@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 10:45:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:11:37AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
> > I sent the patch for it which solve this problem in generic way.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/8/42
>
> > Feel free to give me ACK for it.
>
> Will has been working on this too off and on, he was also trying to
> define some semantics for the relaxed versions. It'd be really good to
> address this properly, this is a constant source of make work.
Yes, I have a series adding relaxed accessors to all architectures (and
asm-generic) along with an attempt at defining some semantics. This came
about from discussion with BenH at the last kernel summit, I just didn't get
around to posting what we came up with.
I should be able to post something this week, but there's still an open
question relating to mmiowb() that I'd like the PPC guys to chime in on.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 4:49 [PATCH] spi: cadence: Add dependency on ARCH_ZYNQ Harini Katakam
2014-04-15 4:49 ` Harini Katakam
[not found] ` <CAHTX3dJrMxWJ-8i-wLRkQYtR_zbA+nJyGW+r-DFMYHHU4Erzbw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 9:45 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140415094541.GL12304-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 16:26 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2014-04-15 16:26 ` Will Deacon
2014-04-15 9:49 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140415162621.GO17408@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=harinik-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michals-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.