All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	acme@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/uncore: modularize Intel uncore driver
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:53:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140418105354.GA29167@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395295426-12391-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com>


* Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> wrote:

> This patch adds support for building Intel uncore driver as module.
> It adds clean-up code and config option for the Intel uncore driver
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  move config option to "General setup/Kernel Performance Events and Counters"
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile                  |  3 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  init/Kconfig                                  | 10 ++++++
>  3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 7fd54f0..5d3da70 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD)		+= perf_event_amd_iommu.o
>  endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_p6.o perf_event_knc.o perf_event_p4.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_lbr.o perf_event_intel_ds.o perf_event_intel.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_uncore.o perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)		+= perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE)	+= perf_event_intel_uncore.o
>  endif
>  
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index 618d502..fd5e883 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c

So I'm not willing to apply this patch until the documentation of 
perf_event_intel_uncore.c is improved. Right now the file starts 
without a single comment (!). Just lines after lines of code, without 
any explanation what it does, what its scope is, etc.

How should even a knowledgable user know about what it's all about?

That problem percolates to the Kconfig entry as well:

> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1502,6 +1502,16 @@ config PERF_EVENTS
>  
>  	  Say Y if unsure.
>  
> +config PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE
> +	default y
> +	tristate "Intel uncore performance monitoring support"
> +	depends on PERF_EVENTS && CPU_SUP_INTEL && PCI
> +	help
> +	  This option allows kernel to access the Uncore performance
> +	  monitoring units of Intel processors.
> +
> +	  Say Y if unsure.

Firstly, it should probably not be 'default y'.

Secondly, the description is essentially non-existent. What does the 
hardware do? Why should users care about uncore PMUs?

This needs to be fixed before we can make this modular.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-18 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-20  6:03 [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/uncore: modularize Intel uncore driver Yan, Zheng
2014-03-20  8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-18 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2014-04-18 16:49   ` Andi Kleen
2014-04-21  2:18   ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-22 11:35     ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-23 14:55       ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24  8:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-24 10:25           ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-24 10:36             ` Stephane Eranian
2014-04-24 10:37               ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-24 11:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 13:17                 ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-25 13:55                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 14:06                     ` Yan, Zheng
2014-04-25 14:35                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-25 14:44                         ` Yan, Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140418105354.GA29167@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.