All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: [rcu] 10a94227ba2: -2.0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:26:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140419082622.GA29303@localhost> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2813 bytes --]

Paul,

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git next.2014.04.16b
commit 10a94227ba229f1b05672754dc318a8fe7982c95 ("rcu: Update cpu_needs_another_gp() for futures from non-NOCB CPUs")

test case: nhm4/micro/will-it-scale/lseek1

11ba5ab363b9359  10a94227ba229f1b05672754d  
---------------  -------------------------  
  11210675 ~ 0%      -2.0%   10985451 ~ 0%  TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
      1.24 ~ 5%     -33.4%       0.83 ~ 5%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.trace_hardirqs_off_caller.lseek64
      3.88 ~ 2%     +49.0%       5.79 ~ 0%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.trace_hardirqs_on_thunk.lseek64
       295 ~16%     +27.0%        375 ~ 8%  TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-NHM.usage
     45061 ~ 2%     +16.7%      52590 ~ 2%  TOTAL cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
      1.21 ~ 4%      +5.8%       1.28 ~ 4%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.shmem_file_llseek.sys_lseek.system_call_fastpath.lseek64
      4206 ~ 1%     -78.6%        900 ~ 8%  TOTAL interrupts.IWI
     14303 ~ 1%     +26.7%      18120 ~ 1%  TOTAL interrupts.0:IO-APIC-edge.timer
      3228 ~ 4%     -17.2%       2672 ~ 6%  TOTAL interrupts.RES
       182 ~ 2%      -8.1%        167 ~ 3%  TOTAL time.user_time
       235 ~ 2%      +6.2%        250 ~ 2%  TOTAL time.system_time
    379471 ~ 0%      +1.2%     384127 ~ 0%  TOTAL interrupts.LOC

Legend:
	~XX%    - stddev percent
	[+-]XX% - change percent

It does effectively eliminate interrupts.IWI:

                                   interrupts.IWI

   4500 ++-*-----*-------*--------------------------------------------------+
        |..   *.  +  .*.      .*..*.  .*..*..*..          .*..*..*..*.*..*..*
   4000 *+         *.       *.      *.          *.. .*..*.                  |
   3500 ++                                         *                        |
        |                                                                   |
   3000 ++                                                                  |
   2500 ++                                                                  |
        |                                                                   |
   2000 ++                                                                  |
   1500 ++                                                                  |
        |                                                                   |
   1000 ++                                              O  O  O  O    O  O  O
    500 ++                                                          O       |
        |                                                                   |
      0 O+-O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O-O----------------------+


	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

Thanks,
Fengguang

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@01.org
Subject: [rcu] 10a94227ba2: -2.0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:26:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140419082622.GA29303@localhost> (raw)

Paul,

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git next.2014.04.16b
commit 10a94227ba229f1b05672754dc318a8fe7982c95 ("rcu: Update cpu_needs_another_gp() for futures from non-NOCB CPUs")

test case: nhm4/micro/will-it-scale/lseek1

11ba5ab363b9359  10a94227ba229f1b05672754d  
---------------  -------------------------  
  11210675 ~ 0%      -2.0%   10985451 ~ 0%  TOTAL will-it-scale.per_process_ops
      1.24 ~ 5%     -33.4%       0.83 ~ 5%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.trace_hardirqs_off_caller.lseek64
      3.88 ~ 2%     +49.0%       5.79 ~ 0%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.trace_hardirqs_on_thunk.lseek64
       295 ~16%     +27.0%        375 ~ 8%  TOTAL cpuidle.C1E-NHM.usage
     45061 ~ 2%     +16.7%      52590 ~ 2%  TOTAL cpuidle.C6-NHM.usage
      1.21 ~ 4%      +5.8%       1.28 ~ 4%  TOTAL perf-profile.cpu-cycles.shmem_file_llseek.sys_lseek.system_call_fastpath.lseek64
      4206 ~ 1%     -78.6%        900 ~ 8%  TOTAL interrupts.IWI
     14303 ~ 1%     +26.7%      18120 ~ 1%  TOTAL interrupts.0:IO-APIC-edge.timer
      3228 ~ 4%     -17.2%       2672 ~ 6%  TOTAL interrupts.RES
       182 ~ 2%      -8.1%        167 ~ 3%  TOTAL time.user_time
       235 ~ 2%      +6.2%        250 ~ 2%  TOTAL time.system_time
    379471 ~ 0%      +1.2%     384127 ~ 0%  TOTAL interrupts.LOC

Legend:
	~XX%    - stddev percent
	[+-]XX% - change percent

It does effectively eliminate interrupts.IWI:

                                   interrupts.IWI

   4500 ++-*-----*-------*--------------------------------------------------+
        |..   *.  +  .*.      .*..*.  .*..*..*..          .*..*..*..*.*..*..*
   4000 *+         *.       *.      *.          *.. .*..*.                  |
   3500 ++                                         *                        |
        |                                                                   |
   3000 ++                                                                  |
   2500 ++                                                                  |
        |                                                                   |
   2000 ++                                                                  |
   1500 ++                                                                  |
        |                                                                   |
   1000 ++                                              O  O  O  O    O  O  O
    500 ++                                                          O       |
        |                                                                   |
      0 O+-O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O-O--O--O--O--O--O-O----------------------+


	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

Thanks,
Fengguang

             reply	other threads:[~2014-04-19  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-19  8:26 Fengguang Wu [this message]
2014-04-19  8:26 ` [rcu] 10a94227ba2: -2.0% will-it-scale.per_process_ops Fengguang Wu
2014-04-22  1:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-04-22  1:56   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140419082622.GA29303@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.