From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <aarapov@redhat.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply()
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:58:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423165830.GA29493@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423165808.GA29485@redhat.com>
uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() can fail, but this error is wrongly
ignored. Change uprobe_perf_open() to do uprobe_perf_close() and return
the error code in this case.
Change uprobe_perf_close() to propogate the error from uprobe_apply()
as well, although it should not fail.
The patch looks more complicated because it moves uprobe_perf_close()
up to make it visible to uprobe_perf_open().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 930e514..9aad3e2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -1003,56 +1003,60 @@ uprobe_filter_event(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
return __uprobe_perf_filter(&tu->filter, event->hw.tp_target->mm);
}
-static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- /*
- * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
- * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
- * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
- *
- * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
- * breakpoints we need.
- */
+ list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
+ (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
- list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+ return uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
return 0;
}
-static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
{
bool done;
+ int err;
write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
if (event->hw.tp_target) {
- list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
+ /*
+ * event->parent != NULL means copy_process(), we can avoid
+ * uprobe_apply(). current->mm must be probed and we can rely
+ * on dup_mmap() which preserves the already installed bp's.
+ *
+ * attr.enable_on_exec means that exec/mmap will install the
+ * breakpoints we need.
+ */
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide ||
- (event->hw.tp_target->flags & PF_EXITING) ||
+ event->parent || event->attr.enable_on_exec ||
uprobe_filter_event(tu, event);
+ list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
} else {
- tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
done = tu->filter.nr_systemwide;
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
}
write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
- if (!done)
- uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, false);
-
- return 0;
+ err = 0;
+ if (!done) {
+ err = uprobe_apply(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer, true);
+ if (err)
+ uprobe_perf_close(tu, event);
+ }
+ return err;
}
static bool uprobe_perf_filter(struct uprobe_consumer *uc,
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-23 16:58 [PATCH 0/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-23 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-04-24 3:17 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Steven Rostedt
2014-04-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() fix Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] uprobes/tracing: Make uprobe_perf_close() visible to uprobe_perf_open() Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] uprobes/tracing: Fix uprobe_perf_open() on uprobe_apply() failure Oleg Nesterov
2014-04-24 12:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open()->uprobe_apply() fix Steven Rostedt
2014-04-24 9:03 ` [PATCH 1/1] uprobes/tracing: uprobe_perf_open() forgets to handle the error from uprobe_apply() Srikar Dronamraju
2014-04-24 12:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140423165830.GA29493@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=aarapov@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.