From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Li Zefan <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] blkcg: prepare blkcg knobs for default hierarchy
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:58:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423185835.GD22755@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423185231.GA4163-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 02:52:31PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:17:20PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > I think we should just require two. One for measuring rate in terms
> > of IOPS and other for measuring rate in terms of [kMG]B/sec.
>
> I meant between cfq and blk-throttle. Why do we have separate stats
> for them to present ultimately the same numbers?
Oh, sorry, I had misunderstood your question.
- Number of IOs serviced will be different at throttling layer and
CFQ layer as throttling accounts IO in terms of bios and CFQ
accounts in terms of number of requests.
- CFQ might not be operational on a device while throttling might be
on and one needs bytes stats.
- In a custom kernel throttling might not be on and CFQ is on and
one needs the stats.
So I think we do require duplication of some stats across throttling
and CFQ, isn't it?
Thanks
Vivek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] blkcg: prepare blkcg knobs for default hierarchy
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:58:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423185835.GD22755@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140423185231.GA4163@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 02:52:31PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 01:17:20PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > I think we should just require two. One for measuring rate in terms
> > of IOPS and other for measuring rate in terms of [kMG]B/sec.
>
> I meant between cfq and blk-throttle. Why do we have separate stats
> for them to present ultimately the same numbers?
Oh, sorry, I had misunderstood your question.
- Number of IOs serviced will be different at throttling layer and
CFQ layer as throttling accounts IO in terms of bios and CFQ
accounts in terms of number of requests.
- CFQ might not be operational on a device while throttling might be
on and one needs bytes stats.
- In a custom kernel throttling might not be on and CFQ is on and
one needs the stats.
So I think we do require duplication of some stats across throttling
and CFQ, isn't it?
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-13 1:32 [PATCH RFC] blkcg: prepare blkcg knobs for default hierarchy Tejun Heo
2014-04-13 1:32 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14 18:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-14 19:32 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140414193214.GC16835-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 13:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-15 13:53 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20140415135359.GA13033-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-15 14:06 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 14:06 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15 14:18 ` Vivek Goyal
[not found] ` <20140415141826.GB17018-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-23 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-23 17:01 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140423170141.GJ4781-Gd/HAXX7CRxy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-23 17:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-23 17:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-23 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140423185231.GA4163-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-23 18:58 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-04-23 18:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-23 19:00 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20140423190043.GB4163-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-23 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-23 19:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-04-23 19:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-23 17:39 ` Tejun Heo
2014-05-27 12:49 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140423185835.GD22755@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.