All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>,
	"Linux Kernel, Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kmemleak on __radix_tree_preload
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:41:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140501184112.GH23420@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140501170610.GB28745@arm.com>

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 06:06:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:45:40AM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > 2. Bug
> >  This is one of the results, but all the results indicate
> > __radix_tree_preload.
> > 
> > unreferenced object 0xffff88002ae2a238 (size 576):
> > comm "fsstress", pid 25019, jiffies 4295651360 (age 2276.104s)
> > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > 01 00 00 00 81 ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > 40 7d 37 81 ff ff ff ff 50 a2 e2 2a 00 88 ff ff  @}7.....P..*....
> > backtrace:
> >  [<ffffffff8170e546>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff8119feac>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xdc/0x190
> >  [<ffffffff81378709>] __radix_tree_preload+0x49/0xc0
> >  [<ffffffff813787a1>] radix_tree_maybe_preload+0x21/0x30
> >  [<ffffffff8114bbbc>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x3c/0xc0
> >  [<ffffffff8114c778>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x98/0xf0
> >  [<ffffffffa02d3151>] f2fs_write_begin+0xa1/0x370 [f2fs]
> >  [<ffffffff8114af47>] generic_perform_write+0xc7/0x1e0
> >  [<ffffffff8114d230>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1d0/0x400
> >  [<ffffffff8114d4c0>] generic_file_aio_write+0x60/0xe0
> >  [<ffffffff811b281a>] do_sync_write+0x5a/0x90
> >  [<ffffffff811b3575>] vfs_write+0xc5/0x1f0
> >  [<ffffffff811b3a92>] SyS_write+0x52/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffff81730912>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 
> Do all the backtraces look like the above (coming from
> add_to_page_cache_lru)?
> 
> There were some changes in lib/radix-tree.c since 3.14, maybe you could
> try reverting them and see if the leaks still appear (cc'ing Johannes).
> It could also be a false positive.
>
> An issue with debugging such cases is that the preloading is common for
> multiple radix trees, so the actual radix_tree_node_alloc() could be on
> a different path. You could give the patch below a try to see what
> backtrace you get (it updates backtrace in radix_tree_node_alloc()).

That patch makes a lot of sense to me.  I applied it locally but I am
unable to reproduce this with page cache heavy workloads.  Jaegeuk?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>,
	"Linux Kernel, Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kmemleak on __radix_tree_preload
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 14:41:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140501184112.GH23420@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140501170610.GB28745@arm.com>

On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 06:06:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:45:40AM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > 2. Bug
> >  This is one of the results, but all the results indicate
> > __radix_tree_preload.
> > 
> > unreferenced object 0xffff88002ae2a238 (size 576):
> > comm "fsstress", pid 25019, jiffies 4295651360 (age 2276.104s)
> > hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> > 01 00 00 00 81 ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> > 40 7d 37 81 ff ff ff ff 50 a2 e2 2a 00 88 ff ff  @}7.....P..*....
> > backtrace:
> >  [<ffffffff8170e546>] kmemleak_alloc+0x26/0x50
> >  [<ffffffff8119feac>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xdc/0x190
> >  [<ffffffff81378709>] __radix_tree_preload+0x49/0xc0
> >  [<ffffffff813787a1>] radix_tree_maybe_preload+0x21/0x30
> >  [<ffffffff8114bbbc>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x3c/0xc0
> >  [<ffffffff8114c778>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x98/0xf0
> >  [<ffffffffa02d3151>] f2fs_write_begin+0xa1/0x370 [f2fs]
> >  [<ffffffff8114af47>] generic_perform_write+0xc7/0x1e0
> >  [<ffffffff8114d230>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x1d0/0x400
> >  [<ffffffff8114d4c0>] generic_file_aio_write+0x60/0xe0
> >  [<ffffffff811b281a>] do_sync_write+0x5a/0x90
> >  [<ffffffff811b3575>] vfs_write+0xc5/0x1f0
> >  [<ffffffff811b3a92>] SyS_write+0x52/0xb0
> >  [<ffffffff81730912>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 
> Do all the backtraces look like the above (coming from
> add_to_page_cache_lru)?
> 
> There were some changes in lib/radix-tree.c since 3.14, maybe you could
> try reverting them and see if the leaks still appear (cc'ing Johannes).
> It could also be a false positive.
>
> An issue with debugging such cases is that the preloading is common for
> multiple radix trees, so the actual radix_tree_node_alloc() could be on
> a different path. You could give the patch below a try to see what
> backtrace you get (it updates backtrace in radix_tree_node_alloc()).

That patch makes a lot of sense to me.  I applied it locally but I am
unable to reproduce this with page cache heavy workloads.  Jaegeuk?

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-01 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-25  1:45 [BUG] kmemleak on __radix_tree_preload Jaegeuk Kim
2014-04-25  1:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-01 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 17:06   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-01 18:41   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2014-05-01 18:41     ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-07  2:58     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-07  2:58       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-07 11:39       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-07 11:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08  9:16         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08  9:16           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08  9:26           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08  9:26             ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08  9:37             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08  9:37               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08 10:24               ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 10:24                 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:00                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 15:00                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 15:29                   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:29                     ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 15:53                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 15:53                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-08 16:52                       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 16:52                         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09  0:06                         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-09  0:06                           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-08 17:52                       ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-08 17:52                         ` Johannes Weiner
2014-05-08 21:40                         ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-08 21:40                           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09  0:01                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-09  0:01                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2014-05-09  9:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-09  9:45                         ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140501184112.GH23420@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.