From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:24:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140508062418.GF5282@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4Pn2VUEnQ8FyOaBffqfUiHt6ocLEEvyaJrSKmTjaNp_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:52:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> Most popular use of zram is the in-memory swap for small embedded system
> >> so I don't want to increase memory footprint without good reason although
> >> it makes synthetic benchmark. Alhought it's 1M for 1G, it isn't small if we
> >> consider compression ratio and real free memory after boot
>
> We can use bit spin lock and this would not increase memory footprint for 32 bit
> platform.
Sounds like a idea.
Weijie, Do you mind testing with bit spin lock?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Cc: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:24:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140508062418.GF5282@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAmzW4Pn2VUEnQ8FyOaBffqfUiHt6ocLEEvyaJrSKmTjaNp_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:52:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> Most popular use of zram is the in-memory swap for small embedded system
> >> so I don't want to increase memory footprint without good reason although
> >> it makes synthetic benchmark. Alhought it's 1M for 1G, it isn't small if we
> >> consider compression ratio and real free memory after boot
>
> We can use bit spin lock and this would not increase memory footprint for 32 bit
> platform.
Sounds like a idea.
Weijie, Do you mind testing with bit spin lock?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 4:01 [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS Weijie Yang
2014-05-05 4:01 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-05 10:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-05-05 10:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-05-05 15:20 ` Seth Jennings
2014-05-05 15:20 ` Seth Jennings
2014-05-05 18:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-05 18:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-05 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-05 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-05 22:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-05 22:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-07 7:51 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-07 7:51 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-07 8:57 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-07 8:57 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-07 9:16 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-07 9:16 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-07 14:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-05-07 14:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2014-05-08 6:24 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-05-08 6:24 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-10 6:10 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-10 6:10 ` Weijie Yang
2014-05-12 5:15 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-12 5:15 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-12 14:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-12 14:49 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-13 0:03 ` Minchan Kim
2014-05-13 0:03 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140508062418.GF5282@bbox \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=heesub.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
--cc=weijie.yang.kh@gmail.com \
--cc=weijie.yang@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.