From: jhovold@gmail.com (Johan Hovold)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:51:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509145125.GD6776@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399646610-18816-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
>
> Hence we should not rely on what IMR claims about already masked IRQs
> and just disable all IRQs.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.10+
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
Looks good, but for the future: Why do you break the comment lines you
added at column 60?
Thanks,
Johan
> ---
> Hello,
>
> Again, sorry for the noise, but I forgot to add Nicolas' ack and to keep
> Andrew and the stable ML in cc.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> Changes since v3:
> - fix commit message and comment
> Changes since v2:
> - removed unused variable 'mask'
> Changes since v1:
> - use a macro to define IRQs bitmask
> - read IMR register to ensure the write to IDR has been flushed
> - quote atmel's datasheet errata in commit message
> - comment the code to describe why we're not using IMR to disable
> the interrupts
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> index 2ba694f..f8bc351 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> @@ -25,24 +25,28 @@
>
> #include "generic.h"
>
> -#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> -#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK 0x1f /* Available IRQs mask */
>
> void __init at91_sysirq_mask_rtc(u32 rtc_base)
> {
> void __iomem *base;
> - u32 mask;
>
> base = ioremap(rtc_base, 64);
> if (!base)
> return;
>
> - mask = readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR);
> - if (mask) {
> - pr_info("AT91: Disabling rtc irq\n");
> - writel_relaxed(mask, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> - (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
> - }
> + /*
> + * sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> + * "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> + * Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
> + *
> + * Hence we're not relying on IMR values to disable
> + * interrupts.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed(AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> + (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
>
> iounmap(base);
> }
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
To: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Bryan Evenson <bevenson@melinkcorp.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Roszko <mark.roszko@gmail.com>,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:51:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509145125.GD6776@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399646610-18816-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
>
> Hence we should not rely on what IMR claims about already masked IRQs
> and just disable all IRQs.
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.10+
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
Looks good, but for the future: Why do you break the comment lines you
added at column 60?
Thanks,
Johan
> ---
> Hello,
>
> Again, sorry for the noise, but I forgot to add Nicolas' ack and to keep
> Andrew and the stable ML in cc.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Boris
>
> Changes since v3:
> - fix commit message and comment
> Changes since v2:
> - removed unused variable 'mask'
> Changes since v1:
> - use a macro to define IRQs bitmask
> - read IMR register to ensure the write to IDR has been flushed
> - quote atmel's datasheet errata in commit message
> - comment the code to describe why we're not using IMR to disable
> the interrupts
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> index 2ba694f..f8bc351 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sysirq_mask.c
> @@ -25,24 +25,28 @@
>
> #include "generic.h"
>
> -#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> -#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IDR 0x24 /* Interrupt Disable Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IMR 0x28 /* Interrupt Mask Register */
> +#define AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK 0x1f /* Available IRQs mask */
>
> void __init at91_sysirq_mask_rtc(u32 rtc_base)
> {
> void __iomem *base;
> - u32 mask;
>
> base = ioremap(rtc_base, 64);
> if (!base)
> return;
>
> - mask = readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR);
> - if (mask) {
> - pr_info("AT91: Disabling rtc irq\n");
> - writel_relaxed(mask, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> - (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
> - }
> + /*
> + * sam9x5 SoCs have the following errata:
> + * "RTC: Interrupt Mask Register cannot be used
> + * Interrupt Mask Register read always returns 0."
> + *
> + * Hence we're not relying on IMR values to disable
> + * interrupts.
> + */
> + writel_relaxed(AT91_RTC_IRQ_MASK, base + AT91_RTC_IDR);
> + (void)readl_relaxed(base + AT91_RTC_IMR); /* flush */
>
> iounmap(base);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-09 14:43 [RESEND PATCH v4] ARM: at91: fix at91_sysirq_mask_rtc for sam9x5 SoCs Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 14:43 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 14:51 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2014-05-09 14:51 ` Johan Hovold
2014-05-09 15:00 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-05-09 15:00 ` Boris BREZILLON
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140509145125.GD6776@localhost \
--to=jhovold@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.