All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Avoid event on passed PE
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 00:01:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523000149.GA12034@shangw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537DC9AD.3090202@suse.de>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>If we detects frozen state on PE that has been passed through to somebody
>>else. we needn't handle it. Instead, we rely on the device's owner to
>>detect and recover it. The patch avoid EEH event on the frozen passed PE so
>>that the device's owner can have chance to handle that.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>I think you want to fold this with patch 1/3.
>

Yes, I'll do it in next revision.

Thanks,
Gavin

>>---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c                 | 8 ++++++++
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c | 3 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>index b90a474..aee6cc5 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>@@ -403,6 +403,14 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
>>  	if (ret > 0)
>>  		return ret;
>>+	/*
>>+	 * If the PE isn't owned by us, we shouldn't check the
>>+	 * state. Instead, let the owner handle it if the PE has
>>+	 * been frozen.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (eeh_pe_passed(pe))
>>+		return 0;
>>+
>>  	/* If we already have a pending isolation event for this
>>  	 * slot, we know it's bad already, we don't need to check.
>>  	 * Do this checking under a lock; as multiple PCI devices
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>index 1b5982f..03a3ed2 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
>>  				opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id, frozen_pe_no,
>>  					OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>  				ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
>>-			} else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED) {
>>+			} else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED ||
>>+				   eeh_pe_passed(*pe)) {
>>  				ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
>>  			} else {
>>  				pr_err("EEH: Frozen PHB#%x-PE#%x (%s) detected\n",
>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Avoid event on passed PE
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:01:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523000149.GA12034@shangw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <537DC9AD.3090202@suse.de>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>On 22.05.14 10:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>If we detects frozen state on PE that has been passed through to somebody
>>else. we needn't handle it. Instead, we rely on the device's owner to
>>detect and recover it. The patch avoid EEH event on the frozen passed PE so
>>that the device's owner can have chance to handle that.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>I think you want to fold this with patch 1/3.
>

Yes, I'll do it in next revision.

Thanks,
Gavin

>>---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c                 | 8 ++++++++
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c | 3 ++-
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>index b90a474..aee6cc5 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
>>@@ -403,6 +403,14 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev)
>>  	if (ret > 0)
>>  		return ret;
>>+	/*
>>+	 * If the PE isn't owned by us, we shouldn't check the
>>+	 * state. Instead, let the owner handle it if the PE has
>>+	 * been frozen.
>>+	 */
>>+	if (eeh_pe_passed(pe))
>>+		return 0;
>>+
>>  	/* If we already have a pending isolation event for this
>>  	 * slot, we know it's bad already, we don't need to check.
>>  	 * Do this checking under a lock; as multiple PCI devices
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>index 1b5982f..03a3ed2 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/eeh-ioda.c
>>@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ static int ioda_eeh_next_error(struct eeh_pe **pe)
>>  				opal_pci_eeh_freeze_clear(phb->opal_id, frozen_pe_no,
>>  					OPAL_EEH_ACTION_CLEAR_FREEZE_ALL);
>>  				ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
>>-			} else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED) {
>>+			} else if ((*pe)->state & EEH_PE_ISOLATED ||
>>+				   eeh_pe_passed(*pe)) {
>>  				ret = EEH_NEXT_ERR_NONE;
>>  			} else {
>>  				pr_err("EEH: Frozen PHB#%x-PE#%x (%s) detected\n",
>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-23  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22  8:23 [PATCH v6 0/3] EEH Support for VFIO PCI device Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] powerpc/eeh: Flags for passed device and PE Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23   ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] drivers/vfio: EEH support for VFIO PCI device Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23   ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  9:55   ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-22  9:55     ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  0:17     ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  0:17       ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  0:37       ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  0:37         ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  3:23         ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23  3:23           ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23  6:52           ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  6:52             ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 11:58             ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 11:58               ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:30               ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 12:30                 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 14:49                 ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 14:49                   ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-24  1:37                   ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-24  1:37                     ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:51             ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 12:51               ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 13:24               ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 13:24                 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  3:10   ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23  3:10     ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23  4:37     ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  4:37       ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  5:00       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-05-23  5:00         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-05-23 14:36         ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 14:36           ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23  6:55       ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  6:55         ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  7:37         ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  7:37           ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23  9:58           ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  9:58             ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 11:55             ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 11:55               ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 11:58               ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 11:58                 ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 12:43                 ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:43                   ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 12:49                   ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23 12:49                     ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-24  1:46                     ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-24  1:46                       ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-23 14:29       ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-23 14:29         ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-24  2:06         ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-24  2:06           ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-27 17:39           ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-27 17:39             ` Alex Williamson
2014-05-22  8:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] powerpc/eeh: Avoid event on passed PE Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  8:23   ` Gavin Shan
2014-05-22  9:55   ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-22  9:55     ` Alexander Graf
2014-05-23  0:01     ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2014-05-23  0:01       ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140523000149.GA12034@shangw \
    --to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=qiudayu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.