From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: Update msm8960 device trees
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:09:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528200948.GI2012@joshc.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401301643-20191-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:27:23PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> * Move SoC peripherals into an SoC container node
> * Move serial enabling into board file (qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts)
> * Cleanup cpu node to match binding spec, enable-method and compatible
> should be per cpu, not part of the container
> * Drop interrupts property from l2-cache node as its not part of the
> binding spec
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts | 6 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 165 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> index a58fb88..8e77ed7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> @@ -3,4 +3,10 @@
> / {
> model = "Qualcomm MSM8960 CDP";
> compatible = "qcom,msm8960-cdp", "qcom,msm8960";
> +
> + soc {
> + serial@16440000 {
> + status = "ok";
> + };
> + };
> };
Is now the time put these serial nodes under a GSBI parent node?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: joshc@codeaurora.org (Josh Cartwright)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: Update msm8960 device trees
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:09:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140528200948.GI2012@joshc.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401301643-20191-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:27:23PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> * Move SoC peripherals into an SoC container node
> * Move serial enabling into board file (qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts)
> * Cleanup cpu node to match binding spec, enable-method and compatible
> should be per cpu, not part of the container
> * Drop interrupts property from l2-cache node as its not part of the
> binding spec
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts | 6 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 165 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> index a58fb88..8e77ed7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8960-cdp.dts
> @@ -3,4 +3,10 @@
> / {
> model = "Qualcomm MSM8960 CDP";
> compatible = "qcom,msm8960-cdp", "qcom,msm8960";
> +
> + soc {
> + serial at 16440000 {
> + status = "ok";
> + };
> + };
> };
Is now the time put these serial nodes under a GSBI parent node?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 18:27 [PATCH] ARM: dts: qcom: Update msm8960 device trees Kumar Gala
2014-05-28 18:27 ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-28 20:09 ` Josh Cartwright [this message]
2014-05-28 20:09 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-05-28 20:18 ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-28 20:18 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140528200948.GI2012@joshc.qualcomm.com \
--to=joshc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.