All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:23:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda> (raw)

My static checker complains that if "num_raid_params" is UINT_MAX then
the "if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {" check doesn't work as intended.

The other change is that I moved the "if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2))"
condition forward a few lines so it was before the call to
context_alloc().  If we had an integer overflow inside that function
then it would lead to an immediate crash.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
Static checker stuff.  Not tested.

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index 4880b69..e0d53fe 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	argv++;
 
 	/* Skip over RAID params for now and find out # of devices */
-	if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {
+	if (num_raid_params >= argc) {
 		ti->error = "Arguments do not agree with counts given";
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1200,6 +1200,12 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
+	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
+		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	rs = context_alloc(ti, rt, (unsigned)num_raid_devs);
 	if (IS_ERR(rs))
 		return PTR_ERR(rs);
@@ -1208,16 +1214,8 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;
 
-	ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
 	argv += num_raid_params + 1;
 
-	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
-		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
-		goto bad;
-	}
-
 	ret = dev_parms(rs, argv);
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:23:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda> (raw)

My static checker complains that if "num_raid_params" is UINT_MAX then
the "if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {" check doesn't work as intended.

The other change is that I moved the "if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2))"
condition forward a few lines so it was before the call to
context_alloc().  If we had an integer overflow inside that function
then it would lead to an immediate crash.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
---
Static checker stuff.  Not tested.

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index 4880b69..e0d53fe 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	argv++;
 
 	/* Skip over RAID params for now and find out # of devices */
-	if (num_raid_params + 1 > argc) {
+	if (num_raid_params >= argc) {
 		ti->error = "Arguments do not agree with counts given";
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -1200,6 +1200,12 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
+	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
+		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	rs = context_alloc(ti, rt, (unsigned)num_raid_devs);
 	if (IS_ERR(rs))
 		return PTR_ERR(rs);
@@ -1208,16 +1214,8 @@ static int raid_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned argc, char **argv)
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;
 
-	ret = -EINVAL;
-
-	argc -= num_raid_params + 1; /* +1: we already have num_raid_devs */
 	argv += num_raid_params + 1;
 
-	if (argc != (num_raid_devs * 2)) {
-		ti->error = "Supplied RAID devices does not match the count given";
-		goto bad;
-	}
-
 	ret = dev_parms(rs, argv);
 	if (ret)
 		goto bad;

             reply	other threads:[~2014-05-29  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-29  8:23 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2014-05-29  8:23 ` [patch] DM RAID: fix a couple integer overflows Dan Carpenter
2014-10-21 12:43 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-10-21 12:43   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140529082323.GA9209@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.