All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] fs: ocfs2: move_extents.c: Fix to remove null pointer checks that could never happen
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:23:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529212308.GA16353@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529140337.f999bfaaf9ffabce071962ea@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 02:03:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Tue, 27 May 2014 22:23:51 +0200 Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> wrote:
 > 
 > > Removal of null pointer checks that could never happen
 > 
 > How do you know it never happens?
 > 
 > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
 > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
 > > @@ -904,9 +904,6 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extents(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context)
 > >  	struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
 > >  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
 > >  
 > > -	if (!inode)
 > > -		return -ENOENT;
 > > -
 > 
 > If it's due to assuming that the previous statement would have oopsed
 > then that is mistaken.  Is is sometimes the case that gcc will move the
 > evaluation of inode->i_sb to after the test, so this function can be
 > passed NULL and it will not oops.

'sometimes' ?

You have a lot more faith in gcc than I do. What happens if we decide to
switch to llvm one day ? Can we guarantee every compiler will implement
the same magic ?  This seems fragile as hell to me.

	Dave

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se>,
	Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: ocfs2: move_extents.c:  Fix to remove null pointer checks that could never happen
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:23:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140529212308.GA16353@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140529140337.f999bfaaf9ffabce071962ea@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 02:03:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Tue, 27 May 2014 22:23:51 +0200 Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> wrote:
 > 
 > > Removal of null pointer checks that could never happen
 > 
 > How do you know it never happens?
 > 
 > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
 > > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
 > > @@ -904,9 +904,6 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extents(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context)
 > >  	struct buffer_head *di_bh = NULL;
 > >  	struct ocfs2_super *osb = OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb);
 > >  
 > > -	if (!inode)
 > > -		return -ENOENT;
 > > -
 > 
 > If it's due to assuming that the previous statement would have oopsed
 > then that is mistaken.  Is is sometimes the case that gcc will move the
 > evaluation of inode->i_sb to after the test, so this function can be
 > passed NULL and it will not oops.

'sometimes' ?

You have a lot more faith in gcc than I do. What happens if we decide to
switch to llvm one day ? Can we guarantee every compiler will implement
the same magic ?  This seems fragile as hell to me.

	Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-29 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-27 20:23 [PATCH] fs: ocfs2: move_extents.c: Fix to remove null pointer checks that could never happen Rickard Strandqvist
2014-05-29 21:03 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 21:03   ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 21:23   ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-05-29 21:23     ` Dave Jones
2014-05-29 21:38     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 21:38       ` Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 22:39       ` Rickard Strandqvist
2014-05-29 22:42         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Andrew Morton
2014-05-29 22:42           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140529212308.GA16353@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.