From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
thornber@redhat.com,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Testing the new LVM cache feature
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:40:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140530134020.GK1302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530133814.GB8830@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Why are you setting {read,write}_promote_adjustment to 1? I asked you
> to set write_promote_adjustment to 0.
I didn't realize there would be (much) difference. However I
will certainly try it with write_promote_adjustment == 0.
> Your random fio job won't hit the same blocks, and md5sum likely uses
> buffered IO so unless you set 0 for both the cache won't aggressively
> cache like you're expecting.
Right, that was definitely a mistake! I will drop_caches between each
md5sum operation.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 10:18 [linux-lvm] Testing the new LVM cache feature Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 14:43 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-05-22 15:22 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 15:49 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 18:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-22 18:13 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 13:52 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 20:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-29 20:47 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 21:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-29 21:19 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 21:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 9:04 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 10:30 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 13:40 ` Richard W.M. Jones [this message]
2014-05-30 13:42 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2014-05-30 13:54 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-05-30 13:46 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:54 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2014-05-30 14:26 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:51 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 15:28 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 18:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 20:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 13:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:29 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 11:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 11:38 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2014-05-30 11:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2014-05-30 12:45 ` Werner Gold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140530134020.GK1302@redhat.com \
--to=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.