From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>
Cc: thornber@redhat.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Testing the new LVM cache feature
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:58:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53888E68.4080202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140530135407.GM1302@redhat.com>
Dne 30.5.2014 15:54, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
> I'm attaching 3 tests that I have run so (hopefully) you can see
> what I'm observing, or point out if I'm making a mistake.
>
I'd have asked - is there any difference in the test perfomance if you use
ramdisk device for your cache metadata device.
(So _cdata stays on 'ssd', just _cmeta is located on i.e. loop0 with backend
file in your tmpfs ramdisk device ?)
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 10:18 [linux-lvm] Testing the new LVM cache feature Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 14:43 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-05-22 15:22 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 15:49 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-22 18:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-22 18:13 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 13:52 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 20:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-29 20:47 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 21:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-29 21:19 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-29 21:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 9:04 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 10:30 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 13:40 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:42 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2014-05-30 13:54 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:58 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2014-05-30 13:46 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 13:54 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2014-05-30 14:26 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:36 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:51 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:58 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 15:28 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 18:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 20:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 13:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 14:29 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2014-05-30 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 11:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2014-05-30 11:38 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2014-05-30 11:45 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2014-05-30 12:45 ` Werner Gold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53888E68.4080202@redhat.com \
--to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.