From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Define enable / disable irq callbacks for level triggered irqs
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 15:47:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140603134753.GL27722@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401544899-405-6-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:39PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some drivers use disable_irq / enable_irq and do the work clearing the source
> in another thread instead of using a threaded interrupt handler.
>
> The irqchip used not having irq_disable and irq_enable callbacks in this case,
> will lead to unnecessary spurious interrupts:
>
> On a disable_irq in a chip without a handller for this, the irq core will
> remember the disable, but not actually call into the irqchip. With a level
> triggered interrupt (where the source has not been cleared) this will lead
> to an immediate retrigger, at which point the irq-core will mask the irq.
> So having an irq_disable callback in the irqchip will save us the interrupt
> firing a 2nd time for nothing.
Judging by the comments there, it seems more like a feature.
> Drivers using disable / enable_irq like this, will call enable_irq when
> they finally have cleared the interrupt source, without an enable_irq callback,
> this will turn into an unmask, at which point the irq will trigger immediately
> because when it was originally acked the level was still high, so the ack was
> a nop.
I don't think enable_irq offers any warranty regarding the state of
the interrupt. It's up to the driver to clear the interrupts before
calling enable_irq if it doesn't want any irrelevant/spurious
interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index 418a430..6ccbe43 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d);
> static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d);
> static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d);
> +static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack_unmask(struct irq_data *d);
> static int sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type);
>
> static struct sunxi_pinctrl_group *
> @@ -563,6 +564,10 @@ static struct irq_chip sunxi_pinctrl_level_irq_chip = {
> .irq_eoi = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack,
> .irq_mask = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask,
> .irq_unmask = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask,
> + /* Define irq_enable / disable to avoid spurious irqs for drivers
> + * using these to suppress irqs while they clear the irq source */
What "drivers" are we talking about? I grepped for a while, and didn't
any obvious candidates.
But again, I feel like if a driver wants to work outside of the usual
interrupt workflow, it's up to the driver itself to know what it's
doing.
> + .irq_enable = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack_unmask,
> + .irq_disable = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_mask,
> .irq_request_resources = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_request_resources,
> .irq_set_type = sunxi_pinctrl_irq_set_type,
> .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED
> @@ -662,6 +667,28 @@ static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +static void sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + u32 ctrl_reg = sunxi_irq_ctrl_reg(d->hwirq);
> + u8 ctrl_idx = sunxi_irq_ctrl_offset(d->hwirq);
> + u32 status_reg = sunxi_irq_status_reg(d->hwirq);
> + u8 status_idx = sunxi_irq_status_offset(d->hwirq);
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Clear the IRQ */
> + writel(1 << status_idx, pctl->membase + status_reg);
> +
> + /* Unmask the IRQ */
> + val = readl(pctl->membase + ctrl_reg);
> + writel(val | (1 << ctrl_idx), pctl->membase + ctrl_reg);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
> +}
Please at least call sunxi_pinctrl_irq_ack and
sunxi_pinctrl_irq_unmask if you're doing this.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140603/08da55c8/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-31 14:01 [PATCH v2 0/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Fix level triggered interrupt support Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Fix sunxi_irq_cfg_reg not working for irqs >= 8 Hans de Goede
2014-06-02 10:18 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-06-09 13:21 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-09 13:45 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Add IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for pinctrl irq chip Hans de Goede
2014-06-02 10:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-05-31 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Move setting of mux to irq type from unmask to request_resources Hans de Goede
2014-06-02 11:59 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-06-03 15:42 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Properly handle level triggered gpio interrupts Hans de Goede
2014-06-03 13:30 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-06-03 15:13 ` Hans de Goede
2014-06-17 18:43 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-06-23 14:53 ` Hans de Goede
2014-05-31 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Define enable / disable irq callbacks for level triggered irqs Hans de Goede
2014-06-03 13:47 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-06-03 15:34 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140603134753.GL27722@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.