Re: [PATCH v2] vmalloc: use rcu list iterator to reduce vmap_area_lock contention

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:34:04 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> wrote:

> > While rcu list traversal over the vmap_area_list is safe, this may
> > arrive at different results than the spinlocked version. The rcu list
> > traversal version will not be a 'snapshot' of a single, valid instant
> > of the entire vmap_area_list, but rather a potential amalgam of
> > different list states.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Yes, you are right, but I don't think that we should be strict here.
> Meminfo is already not a 'snapshot' at specific time. While we try to
> get certain stats, the other stats can change.
> And, although we may arrive at different results than the spinlocked
> version, the difference would not be large and would not make serious
> side-effect.

mm, well...  The spinlocked version will at least report a number which
*used* to be true.  The new improved racy version could for example see
a bunch of new allocations but fail to see the bunch of frees which
preceded those new allocations.  Net result: it reports allocation
totals which exceed anything which this kernel has ever sustained.

But hey, it's only /proc/meminfo:VmallocFoo.  I'll eat my hat if anyone
cares about it.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>