All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel mailing list <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add DAI master mode support for SSI on i.MX series
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140613085602.GA16026@MrMyself> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hioo5gp66.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:24:55 -0500,
> Timur Tabi wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Nicolin Chen
> > <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +static int fsl_ssi_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
> > > +                                 int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct fsl_ssi_private *ssi_private = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
> > > +       struct ccsr_ssi __iomem *ssi = ssi_private->ssi;
> > > +       int synchronous = ssi_private->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_rates, ret;
> > > +       u32 pm = 999, div2, psr, stccr, mask, afreq, factor, i;
> > > +       unsigned long flags, clkrate, baudrate, tmprate;
> > > +       u64 sub, savesub = 100000;
> > > +
> > > +       /* Don't apply it to any non-baudclk circumstance */
> > > +       if (IS_ERR(ssi_private->baudclk))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +       /* It should be already enough to divide clock by setting pm alone */
> > > +       psr = 0;
> > > +       div2 = 0;
> > > +
> > > +       factor = (div2 + 1) * (7 * psr + 1) * 2;
> > > +
> > > +       for (i = 0; i < 255; i++) {
> > > +               /* The bclk rate must be smaller than 1/5 sysclk rate */
> > > +               if (factor * (i + 1) < 5)
> > > +                       continue;
> > > +
> > > +               tmprate = freq * factor * (i + 2);
> > > +               clkrate = clk_round_rate(ssi_private->baudclk, tmprate);
> > > +
> > > +               do_div(clkrate, factor);
> > 
> > This do_div() call causes this warning on PowerPC:
> > 
> >   CC      sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.o
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: In function 'fsl_ssi_set_bclk':
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: comparison of distinct pointer
> > types lacks a cast
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: right shift count >= width of type
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type
> > include/asm-generic/div64.h:35:17: note: expected 'uint64_t *' but
> > argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
> > 
> > The comments in do_div() say that clkrate should be 64-bits.  Changing
> > clkrate to a u64 does fix this problem, but I'm wondering if anyone
> > else has seen this.  This code has been around for months.
> 
> Using do_div() for unsigned long makes no sense.
> And, you *must* pass uint64_t there as an argument, since it's no
> inline function and there is no implicit conversion in the generic
> code.
> 
> In short, use the normal division operator instead:
> 	clkrate /= factor;

Yes. I forgot why I used do_div() for clkrate at the first place
but it's definitely a mistake here.

Sorry,
Nicolin

> 
> 
> Takashi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: alsa-devel mailing list <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC][PATCH v1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add DAI master mode support for SSI on i.MX series
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:56:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140613085602.GA16026@MrMyself> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hioo5gp66.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 12 Jun 2014 22:24:55 -0500,
> Timur Tabi wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Nicolin Chen
> > <Guangyu.Chen@freescale.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +static int fsl_ssi_set_dai_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *cpu_dai,
> > > +                                 int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct fsl_ssi_private *ssi_private = snd_soc_dai_get_drvdata(cpu_dai);
> > > +       struct ccsr_ssi __iomem *ssi = ssi_private->ssi;
> > > +       int synchronous = ssi_private->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_rates, ret;
> > > +       u32 pm = 999, div2, psr, stccr, mask, afreq, factor, i;
> > > +       unsigned long flags, clkrate, baudrate, tmprate;
> > > +       u64 sub, savesub = 100000;
> > > +
> > > +       /* Don't apply it to any non-baudclk circumstance */
> > > +       if (IS_ERR(ssi_private->baudclk))
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > +       /* It should be already enough to divide clock by setting pm alone */
> > > +       psr = 0;
> > > +       div2 = 0;
> > > +
> > > +       factor = (div2 + 1) * (7 * psr + 1) * 2;
> > > +
> > > +       for (i = 0; i < 255; i++) {
> > > +               /* The bclk rate must be smaller than 1/5 sysclk rate */
> > > +               if (factor * (i + 1) < 5)
> > > +                       continue;
> > > +
> > > +               tmprate = freq * factor * (i + 2);
> > > +               clkrate = clk_round_rate(ssi_private->baudclk, tmprate);
> > > +
> > > +               do_div(clkrate, factor);
> > 
> > This do_div() call causes this warning on PowerPC:
> > 
> >   CC      sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.o
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c: In function 'fsl_ssi_set_bclk':
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: comparison of distinct pointer
> > types lacks a cast
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: right shift count >= width of type
> > sound/soc/fsl/fsl_ssi.c:593:3: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type
> > include/asm-generic/div64.h:35:17: note: expected 'uint64_t *' but
> > argument is of type 'long unsigned int *'
> > 
> > The comments in do_div() say that clkrate should be 64-bits.  Changing
> > clkrate to a u64 does fix this problem, but I'm wondering if anyone
> > else has seen this.  This code has been around for months.
> 
> Using do_div() for unsigned long makes no sense.
> And, you *must* pass uint64_t there as an argument, since it's no
> inline function and there is no implicit conversion in the generic
> code.
> 
> In short, use the normal division operator instead:
> 	clkrate /= factor;

Yes. I forgot why I used do_div() for clkrate at the first place
but it's definitely a mistake here.

Sorry,
Nicolin

> 
> 
> Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-13  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-12 10:44 [RFC][PATCH v1] ASoC: fsl_ssi: Add DAI master mode support for SSI on i.MX series Nicolin Chen
2013-12-12 10:44 ` Nicolin Chen
2013-12-18 18:59 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-18 18:59   ` Mark Brown
2013-12-19  2:14   ` Nicolin Chen
2013-12-19  2:14     ` Nicolin Chen
2013-12-19 10:48 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-19 10:48   ` Mark Brown
2014-06-13  3:24 ` Timur Tabi
2014-06-13  3:24   ` [alsa-devel] " Timur Tabi
2014-06-13  3:21   ` Nicolin Chen
2014-06-13  3:21     ` [alsa-devel] " Nicolin Chen
2014-06-13  3:44     ` Timur Tabi
2014-06-13  3:44       ` [alsa-devel] " Timur Tabi
2014-06-13  3:50       ` Nicolin Chen
2014-06-13  3:50         ` [alsa-devel] " Nicolin Chen
2014-06-13  9:00   ` Takashi Iwai
2014-06-13  9:00     ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2014-06-13  8:56     ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2014-06-13  8:56       ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140613085602.GA16026@MrMyself \
    --to=guangyu.chen@freescale.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=timur@tabi.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.