All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Waiman.Long@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	scott.norton@hp.com, raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	david.vrabel@citrix.com, oleg@redhat.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:47:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140615130153.483502389@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140615124657.264658593@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: peter_zijlstra-qspinlock-optimize_for_smaller_nr_cpus.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5809 bytes --]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

When we allow for a max NR_CPUS < 2^14 we can optimize the pending
wait-acquire and the xchg_tail() operations.

By growing the pending bit to a byte, we reduce the tail to 16bit.
This means we can use xchg16 for the tail part and do away with all
the repeated compxchg() operations.

This in turn allows us to unconditionally acquire; the locked state
as observed by the wait loops cannot change. And because both locked
and pending are now a full byte we can use simple stores for the
state transition, obviating one atomic operation entirely.

All this is horribly broken on Alpha pre EV56 (and any other arch that
cannot do single-copy atomic byte stores).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h |   13 ++++
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c            |  103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
@@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 /*
  * Bitfields in the atomic value:
  *
+ * When NR_CPUS < 16K
+ *  0- 7: locked byte
+ *     8: pending
+ *  9-15: not used
+ * 16-17: tail index
+ * 18-31: tail cpu (+1)
+ *
+ * When NR_CPUS >= 16K
  *  0- 7: locked byte
  *     8: pending
  *  9-10: tail index
@@ -50,7 +58,11 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 #define _Q_LOCKED_MASK		_Q_SET_MASK(LOCKED)
 
 #define _Q_PENDING_OFFSET	(_Q_LOCKED_OFFSET + _Q_LOCKED_BITS)
+#if CONFIG_NR_CPUS < (1U << 14)
+#define _Q_PENDING_BITS		8
+#else
 #define _Q_PENDING_BITS		1
+#endif
 #define _Q_PENDING_MASK		_Q_SET_MASK(PENDING)
 
 #define _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET	(_Q_PENDING_OFFSET + _Q_PENDING_BITS)
@@ -61,6 +73,7 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS	(32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
 #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK	_Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_CPU)
 
+#define _Q_TAIL_OFFSET		_Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET
 #define _Q_TAIL_MASK		(_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
 
 #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL		(1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
 
 /*
@@ -48,6 +49,9 @@
  * We can further change the first spinner to spin on a bit in the lock word
  * instead of its node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to
  * unlock, and preserving API.
+ *
+ * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow
+ *      atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types.
  */
 
 #include "mcs_spinlock.h"
@@ -85,6 +89,87 @@ static inline struct mcs_spinlock *decod
 
 #define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK	(_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
 
+/*
+ * By using the whole 2nd least significant byte for the pending bit, we
+ * can allow better optimization of the lock acquisition for the pending
+ * bit holder.
+ */
+#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
+
+struct __qspinlock {
+	union {
+		atomic_t val;
+		struct {
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+			u16	locked_pending;
+			u16	tail;
+#else
+			u16	tail;
+			u16	locked_pending;
+#endif
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @val : Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ *
+ * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	ACCESS_ONCE(l->locked_pending) = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
+ * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @tail : The new queue tail code word
+ * Return: The previous queue tail code word
+ *
+ * xchg(lock, tail)
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	return (u32)xchg(&l->tail, tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET;
+}
+
+#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @val : Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	u32 new, old;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		new = (val & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK) | _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
+
+		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
+		if (old == val)
+			break;
+
+		val = old;
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
  * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
@@ -109,6 +194,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(str
 	}
 	return old;
 }
+#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
 
 /**
  * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock
@@ -173,8 +259,13 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
 	 * we're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
 	 *
 	 * *,1,1 -> *,1,0
+	 *
+	 * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
+	 * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+	 * sequentiality; this because not all clear_pending_set_locked()
+	 * implementations imply full barriers.
 	 */
-	while ((val = atomic_read(&lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+	while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter)) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
 		cpu_relax();
 
 	/*
@@ -182,15 +273,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
 	 *
 	 * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
 	 */
-	for (;;) {
-		new = (val & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK) | _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
-
-		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
-		if (old == val)
-			break;
-
-		val = old;
-	}
+	clear_pending_set_locked(lock, val);
 	return;
 
 	/*

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Waiman.Long@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	paolo.bonzini@gmail.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	riel@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, scott.norton@hp.com,
	chegu_vinod@hp.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 14:47:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140615130153.483502389@chello.nl> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140615124702.EXvbAJjsHfRORtkHQbqRupL88yK1VI9SZWck9MQ5ur8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20140615124657.264658593@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: peter_zijlstra-qspinlock-optimize_for_smaller_nr_cpus.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5811 bytes --]

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

When we allow for a max NR_CPUS < 2^14 we can optimize the pending
wait-acquire and the xchg_tail() operations.

By growing the pending bit to a byte, we reduce the tail to 16bit.
This means we can use xchg16 for the tail part and do away with all
the repeated compxchg() operations.

This in turn allows us to unconditionally acquire; the locked state
as observed by the wait loops cannot change. And because both locked
and pending are now a full byte we can use simple stores for the
state transition, obviating one atomic operation entirely.

All this is horribly broken on Alpha pre EV56 (and any other arch that
cannot do single-copy atomic byte stores).

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h |   13 ++++
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c            |  103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h
@@ -38,6 +38,14 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 /*
  * Bitfields in the atomic value:
  *
+ * When NR_CPUS < 16K
+ *  0- 7: locked byte
+ *     8: pending
+ *  9-15: not used
+ * 16-17: tail index
+ * 18-31: tail cpu (+1)
+ *
+ * When NR_CPUS >= 16K
  *  0- 7: locked byte
  *     8: pending
  *  9-10: tail index
@@ -50,7 +58,11 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 #define _Q_LOCKED_MASK		_Q_SET_MASK(LOCKED)
 
 #define _Q_PENDING_OFFSET	(_Q_LOCKED_OFFSET + _Q_LOCKED_BITS)
+#if CONFIG_NR_CPUS < (1U << 14)
+#define _Q_PENDING_BITS		8
+#else
 #define _Q_PENDING_BITS		1
+#endif
 #define _Q_PENDING_MASK		_Q_SET_MASK(PENDING)
 
 #define _Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET	(_Q_PENDING_OFFSET + _Q_PENDING_BITS)
@@ -61,6 +73,7 @@ typedef struct qspinlock {
 #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS	(32 - _Q_TAIL_CPU_OFFSET)
 #define _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK	_Q_SET_MASK(TAIL_CPU)
 
+#define _Q_TAIL_OFFSET		_Q_TAIL_IDX_OFFSET
 #define _Q_TAIL_MASK		(_Q_TAIL_IDX_MASK | _Q_TAIL_CPU_MASK)
 
 #define _Q_LOCKED_VAL		(1U << _Q_LOCKED_OFFSET)
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <asm/byteorder.h>
 #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
 
 /*
@@ -48,6 +49,9 @@
  * We can further change the first spinner to spin on a bit in the lock word
  * instead of its node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to
  * unlock, and preserving API.
+ *
+ * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow
+ *      atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types.
  */
 
 #include "mcs_spinlock.h"
@@ -85,6 +89,87 @@ static inline struct mcs_spinlock *decod
 
 #define _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK	(_Q_LOCKED_MASK | _Q_PENDING_MASK)
 
+/*
+ * By using the whole 2nd least significant byte for the pending bit, we
+ * can allow better optimization of the lock acquisition for the pending
+ * bit holder.
+ */
+#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
+
+struct __qspinlock {
+	union {
+		atomic_t val;
+		struct {
+#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+			u16	locked_pending;
+			u16	tail;
+#else
+			u16	tail;
+			u16	locked_pending;
+#endif
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @val : Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ *
+ * Lock stealing is not allowed if this function is used.
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	ACCESS_ONCE(l->locked_pending) = _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
+ * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @tail : The new queue tail code word
+ * Return: The previous queue tail code word
+ *
+ * xchg(lock, tail)
+ *
+ * p,*,* -> n,*,* ; prev = xchg(lock, node)
+ */
+static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	return (u32)xchg(&l->tail, tail >> _Q_TAIL_OFFSET) << _Q_TAIL_OFFSET;
+}
+
+#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+
+/**
+ * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
+ * @lock: Pointer to queue spinlock structure
+ * @val : Current value of the queue spinlock 32-bit word
+ *
+ * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
+{
+	u32 new, old;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		new = (val & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK) | _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
+
+		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
+		if (old == val)
+			break;
+
+		val = old;
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * xchg_tail - Put in the new queue tail code word & retrieve previous one
  * @lock : Pointer to queue spinlock structure
@@ -109,6 +194,7 @@ static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(str
 	}
 	return old;
 }
+#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
 
 /**
  * queue_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queue spinlock
@@ -173,8 +259,13 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
 	 * we're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
 	 *
 	 * *,1,1 -> *,1,0
+	 *
+	 * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
+	 * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
+	 * sequentiality; this because not all clear_pending_set_locked()
+	 * implementations imply full barriers.
 	 */
-	while ((val = atomic_read(&lock->val)) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
+	while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter)) & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
 		cpu_relax();
 
 	/*
@@ -182,15 +273,7 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp
 	 *
 	 * *,1,0 -> *,0,1
 	 */
-	for (;;) {
-		new = (val & ~_Q_PENDING_MASK) | _Q_LOCKED_VAL;
-
-		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, val, new);
-		if (old == val)
-			break;
-
-		val = old;
-	}
+	clear_pending_set_locked(lock, val);
 	return;
 
 	/*



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-15 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 191+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-15 12:46 [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/11] qspinlock: A simple generic 4-byte queue spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 20:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:49     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:12         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:20         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:20           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:20         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:03     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:16       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:16         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:16       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 15:56     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 20:49   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:45         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-23 16:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/11] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use " Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] qspinlock: Add pending bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:51     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 20:51     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 20:51       ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 21:07       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:07       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:07         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:10         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:10         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 21:10           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 22:25           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:25           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17 22:25             ` Waiman Long
2014-06-24  8:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24  8:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24  8:24         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 13:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:36         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:36       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 11:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-23 16:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-23 16:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] qspinlock: Extract out the exchange of tail code word Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-17 20:55     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 11:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:37     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:37       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 13:50       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:50       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 13:50         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:46         ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:46         ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:46           ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:49           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:49             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:49           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 16:02           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:02           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:02             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-24 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 10:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-24 10:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-17 20:55   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-06-15 12:47   ` [PATCH 05/11] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:39     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 14:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:08       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 15:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 16:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 16:10             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-07 16:10           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:57   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 15:57     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 14:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] qspinlock: Optimize pending bit Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 11:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 11:42     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] qspinlock: Use a simple write to grab the lock, if applicable Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 16:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:36     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 14:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 14:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 16:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] qspinlock: Revert to test-and-set on hypervisors Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-16 21:57   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 16:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:40     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:40   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Rename paravirt_ticketlocks_enabled Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-18 16:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:43     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-18 16:43   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] qspinlock: Paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 22:08   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:03     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:03       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 15:26       ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:26         ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 15:26       ` Waiman Long
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 22:08   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53     ` Waiman Long
2014-06-17  0:53   ` Waiman Long
2014-06-18 12:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:04   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-18 12:04     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-20 13:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-20 13:46   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-20 13:46     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-15 14:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 14:23         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 14:23       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] qspinlock, kvm: Add paravirt support Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-22 16:36   ` Raghavendra K T
2014-06-22 16:36   ` Raghavendra K T
2014-06-22 16:36     ` Raghavendra K T
2014-07-07 15:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-07 15:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-15 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-16 20:52 ` [PATCH 00/11] qspinlock with " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:52   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-06-16 20:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140615130153.483502389@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.