From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618174710.GB11977@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400914939-9708-11-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com>
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:05AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index e71f81f..fad7612 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -293,28 +293,47 @@ struct compat_shmid64_ds {
> compat_ulong_t __unused5;
> };
>
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
> }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> {
> return test_ti_thread_flag(thread, TIF_32BIT);
> }
> +#else
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> {
> return 0;
> }
Why do we have 2 dummy definitions for is_a32_compat_task()? Could we
not squash them into one with different #ifdefs?
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return is_a32_compat_task();
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return is_a32_compat_thread(thread);
> +}
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* __ASM_COMPAT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> index 36c3603..8180511 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ extern int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>
> /* 1GB of VA */
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> -#define STACK_RND_MASK (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> +#define STACK_RND_MASK (is_compat_task() ? \
> 0x7ff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12) : \
> 0x3ffff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12))
I think I tried something similar in the past and while it works most of
the time, you can easily get into an #include mess since now elf.h needs
compat.h. Similarly for other header files where you've changed this.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 720e70b..b2bf728 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
> #define TIF_FREEZE 19
> #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 20
> #define TIF_SINGLESTEP 21
> -#define TIF_32BIT 22 /* 32bit process */
> +#define TIF_32BIT 22 /* AARCH32 process */
Can we not just keep TIF_32BIT for limiting the address space to 32-bit
and use another bit for AArch32 applications?
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations.
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140618174710.GB11977@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400914939-9708-11-git-send-email-apinski@cavium.com>
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:02:05AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> index e71f81f..fad7612 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h
> @@ -293,28 +293,47 @@ struct compat_shmid64_ds {
> compat_ulong_t __unused5;
> };
>
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT);
> }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> {
> return test_ti_thread_flag(thread, TIF_32BIT);
> }
> +#else
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */
>
> -static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_task(void)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +static inline int is_a32_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> {
> return 0;
> }
Why do we have 2 dummy definitions for is_a32_compat_task()? Could we
not squash them into one with different #ifdefs?
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_task(void)
> +{
> + return is_a32_compat_task();
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_compat_thread(struct thread_info *thread)
> +{
> + return is_a32_compat_thread(thread);
> +}
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> #endif /* __ASM_COMPAT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> index 36c3603..8180511 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ extern int arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>
> /* 1GB of VA */
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> -#define STACK_RND_MASK (test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT) ? \
> +#define STACK_RND_MASK (is_compat_task() ? \
> 0x7ff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12) : \
> 0x3ffff >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 12))
I think I tried something similar in the past and while it works most of
the time, you can easily get into an #include mess since now elf.h needs
compat.h. Similarly for other header files where you've changed this.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 720e70b..b2bf728 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
> #define TIF_FREEZE 19
> #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 20
> #define TIF_SINGLESTEP 21
> -#define TIF_32BIT 22 /* 32bit process */
> +#define TIF_32BIT 22 /* AARCH32 process */
Can we not just keep TIF_32BIT for limiting the address space to 32-bit
and use another bit for AArch32 applications?
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-24 7:01 [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` [PATCH 01/24] ARM64: Force LP64 to compile the kernel Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` [PATCH 02/24] ARM64: Rename COMPAT to AARCH32_EL0 in Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` [PATCH 03/24] ARM64: Change some CONFIG_COMPAT over to use CONFIG_AARCH32_EL0 instead Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:01 ` [PATCH 04/24] ARM64:ILP32: Set kernel_long to long long so we can reuse most of the same syscalls as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:01 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 05/24] ARM64:UAPI: Set the correct __BITS_PER_LONG for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-17 15:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 06/24] Allow for some signal structures to be the same between a 32bit ABI and the 64bit ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 07/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same size and layout of the signal structures for ILP32 as for LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 15:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 15:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 08/24] Allow a 32bit ABI to use the naming of the 64bit ABI syscalls to avoid confusion of not splitting the registers Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-17 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 09/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the same syscall names as LP64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18 8:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-18 8:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 10/24] ARM64: Introduce is_a32_task and is_a32_thread. Use them in the correct locations Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-18 17:47 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-06-18 17:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 11/24] ARM64: Add ARM64_ILP32 to Kconfig Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 12/24] ARM64: Add is_ilp32_compat_task and is_ilp32_compat_thread and TIF_32BIT_AARCH64 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-19 12:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 13/24] Drivers:input: Use is_compat_task for ARM64 also Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-19 12:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 14/24] ARM64:ILP32: COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME is true for ILP32 tasks Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-19 12:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 15/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use the non compat HWCAP for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-19 12:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-19 12:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 13:01 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2014-07-01 13:01 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 16/24] ARM64:ILP32 use the standard start_thread for ILP32 so the processor state is not AARCH32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 17/24] ARM64:ILP32: Support core dump for ILP32 Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 18/24] ARM64: Add loading of ILP32 binaries Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 19/24] ARM64: Add vdso for ILP32 and use it for the signal return Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 20/24] ptrace: Allow compat to use the native siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 21/24] ARM64:ILP32: The native siginfo is used instead of the compat siginfo Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 18:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-24 18:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 22/24] ARM64:ILP32: Use a seperate syscall table as a few syscalls need to be using the compat syscalls Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-07-01 15:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 15:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 15:30 ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-07-01 15:30 ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-07-01 16:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 16:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-01 16:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 23/24] ARM64:ILP32: Fix signal return for ILP32 when the user modified the signal stack Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` [PATCH 24/24] Add documentation about ARM64 ILP32 ABI Andrew Pinski
2014-05-24 7:02 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-06-16 17:08 ` [PATCHv2 00/24] ILP32 Support in ARM64 Catalin Marinas
2014-06-16 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-16 17:19 ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-06-16 17:19 ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-06-17 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 10:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-06-17 11:30 ` Pinski, Andrew
2014-06-17 11:30 ` Pinski, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140618174710.GB11977@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.