From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com, avi@cloudius-systems.com
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] KVM: MMU: reload request from GET_DIRTY_LOG path
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 15:40:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140619184031.GC32410@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140619081719.GD10948@minantech.com>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:17:19AM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 08:12:07PM -0300, mtosatti@redhat.com wrote:
> > Reload remote vcpus MMU from GET_DIRTY_LOG codepath, before
> > deleting a pinned spte.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: kvm.pinned-sptes/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- kvm.pinned-sptes.orig/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c 2014-06-13 16:50:50.040140594 -0300
> > +++ kvm.pinned-sptes/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c 2014-06-13 16:51:05.620104451 -0300
> > @@ -1247,6 +1247,9 @@
> > spte &= ~SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
> > spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
> >
> > + if (is_pinned_spte(spte))
> > + mmu_reload_pinned_vcpus(kvm);
> > +
> Why write protect it at all? mmu_reload_pinned_vcpus() will unprotected it anyway
> on the next vmentry. Isn't it better to just report all pinned pages as dirty alway.
That was the initial plan, however its awkward to stop vcpus, execute
get_dirty_log twice, and have pages marked as dirty on the second
execution.
That is, it is in "incorrect" to report pages as dirty when they are
clean.
Moreover, if the number of pinned pages is larger than the dirty
threshold to stop VM and migrate, you'll never migrate. If vcpus are
in HLT and don't VM-enter immediately, the pages should not be refaulted
right away.
Do you think the optimization is worthwhile ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-19 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 23:12 [patch 0/5] KVM: support for pinning sptes mtosatti
2014-06-18 23:12 ` [patch 1/5] KVM: x86: add pinned parameter to page_fault methods mtosatti
2014-06-18 23:12 ` [patch 2/5] KVM: MMU: allow pinning spte translations (TDP-only) mtosatti
2014-06-19 7:21 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-19 19:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-06-20 10:09 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-30 20:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-06-30 22:00 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-19 8:01 ` Avi Kivity
2014-06-19 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2014-06-19 18:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-06-22 13:35 ` Avi Kivity
2014-07-09 13:25 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-07-02 0:58 ` Nadav Amit
2014-06-18 23:12 ` [patch 3/5] KVM: MMU: notifiers support for pinned sptes mtosatti
2014-06-19 6:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-19 18:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-06-20 10:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-18 23:12 ` [patch 4/5] KVM: MMU: reload request from GET_DIRTY_LOG path mtosatti
2014-06-19 8:17 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-19 18:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2014-06-20 10:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-06-30 20:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-07-01 6:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2014-07-01 17:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2014-06-18 23:12 ` [patch 5/5] KVM: MMU: pinned sps are not candidates for deletion mtosatti
2014-06-19 1:44 ` [patch 0/5] KVM: support for pinning sptes Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140619184031.GC32410@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@cloudius-systems.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.