Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase fails due to no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase.

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@ti.com>]

On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 03:34:38PM -0400, Cooper Jr., Franklin wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: meta-arago-bounces@arago-project.org [mailto:meta-arago-
> > bounces@arago-project.org] On Behalf Of Ulf Samuelsson
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 2:23 PM
> > To: Dmytriyenko, Denys
> > Cc: meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [meta-arago] Fwd: Fwd: Re: [meta-ti] Build of qtbase fails due to
> > no OpenGL libraries, but completes after cleaning qtbase.
> > 
> > 2014-07-02 21:18, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
> > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > >> 2014-07-02 20:13, Denys Dmytriyenko skrev:
> > >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 08:05:09PM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 07:21:24AM +0200, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > >>>>> When I build an image with QT5 using meta-arago, qtbase fails with
> > >>>>> a lot of error messages.
> > >>>>> This is the wrong mailing list - meta-ti has nothing to do with qtbase.
> > >>>>> Moreover, why are you still using 5.1.1? There were many fixes in
> > >>>>> Qt5 5.2.x and 5.3.x. Also, it depends on your setup and what
> > >>>>> layers and features you configure. Either way, it's a discussion
> > >>>>> for a distro layer, you can use meta-arago mailing list for that...
> > >>>> I looked through meta-arago and meta-qt5 about a month ago for
> > compatability.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I checked again today:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> meta-qt5/master	= 5.3.0
> > >>>> meta-qt5/daisy	= 5.2.1
> > >>>> meta-qt5/dora	= 5.1.1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> meta-arago/master = 5.2.0
> > >>>> meta-arago/dora   = 5.2.0 (used to be 5.1.1)
> > >>>> There is no meta-arago/daisy branch.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The only revision I could find which was available in both was 5.1.1.
> > >>>> and that is why I used it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> It would make sense if the qt5 related recipes in meta-arago matched
> > those in meta-qt5.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Now meta-arago is using 5.2.0 which is not present in any branch of
> > >>>> meta-qt5 (did not check old branches, only dora and daisy).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I dont understand why the meta-arago:dora recipes for qt5 has been
> > >>>> updated from 5.1.1 to 5.2.0, thus making it incompatible with meta-
> > qt5:dora. Isn't this a mistake.
> > >>> meta-qt5 for long time only had master, moreover, due to some
> > >>> requirements, we needed latest 5.2 version of qt5, which was only
> > >>> available from master and not from Dora, while meta-arago was
> > >>> generally Dora based. Since then meta-qt5 was updated to 5.2.1, and
> > >>> meta-arago has recently switched to Daisy - some cleanup is still going
> > on...
> > >>>
> > >> I think in order to clean up:
> > >> 1) meta-arago:dora should switch back to 5.1.1
> > >> 2) a daisy branch should be added to meta-arago (or daisy-devel)
> > >> using 5.2.1
> > >> 3) meta-arago:master should be 5.3.0
> > >>
> > >> 5.2.0 recipes should be deleted, or moved to an intermediate branch
> > >> (daisy-rc1?)
> > > No.
> > So whats the plan?
> > Does it make sense to have different version numbers in meta-arago, than in
> > meta-qt5?
> > 
> > Is there a time schedule to have 5.2.1/5,3,0 support?

> [Franklin] The way meta-qt5 and meta-arago works is indeed different 
> compared to other layers. Meta-arago master tracks meta-qt5 master. 
> Meta-arago dora tracks meta-arago daisy. I think we need to properly 

What? Complete nonsense!


> document this and even include it in the README file but of course work on 
> daisy is still being done so it might just be on someone's short term todo 
> list.
> 
> Ulf,
> Are you still having issues with Qt5 support when you use meta-qt5 master?
> > 
> > BR
> > Ulf Samuelsson
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > meta-arago mailing list
> > meta-arago@arago-project.org
> > http://arago-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/meta-arago