All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
	<roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
	<msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Olivier Martin <Olivier.Martin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] efi/arm64: preserve FP/SIMD registers on UEFI runtime services calls
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:45:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140704154522.GJ16404@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403777346-28629-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09:06AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> According to the UEFI spec section 2.3.6.4, the use of FP/SIMD instructions is
> allowed, and should adhere to the AAPCS64 calling convention, which states that
> 'only the bottom 64 bits of each value stored in registers v8-v15 need to be
> preserved' (section 5.1.2).
> 
> This applies equally to UEFI Runtime Services called by the kernel, so make sure
> the FP/SIMD register file is preserved in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

While the code looks fine, I think there is a mismatch between what the
subject says and what the patch does (enabling EFI_RUNTIME_WRAPPERS).

-- 
Catalin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] efi/arm64: preserve FP/SIMD registers on UEFI runtime services calls
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:45:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140704154522.GJ16404@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403777346-28629-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:09:06AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> According to the UEFI spec section 2.3.6.4, the use of FP/SIMD instructions is
> allowed, and should adhere to the AAPCS64 calling convention, which states that
> 'only the bottom 64 bits of each value stored in registers v8-v15 need to be
> preserved' (section 5.1.2).
> 
> This applies equally to UEFI Runtime Services called by the kernel, so make sure
> the FP/SIMD register file is preserved in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

While the code looks fine, I think there is a mismatch between what the
subject says and what the patch does (enabling EFI_RUNTIME_WRAPPERS).

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-04 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-26 10:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] efi: preserve NEON registers on UEFI services calls Ard Biesheuvel
2014-06-26 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found] ` <1403777346-28629-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-26 10:09   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] efi/x86: move UEFI Runtime Services wrappers to generic code Ard Biesheuvel
2014-06-26 10:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]     ` <1403777346-28629-2-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-01 13:30       ` Matt Fleming
2014-07-01 13:30         ` Matt Fleming
     [not found]         ` <20140701133033.GD7539-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-01 13:35           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-01 13:35             ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]             ` <CAKv+Gu_hyXaFEydpRQCB0vP260oJpFftytN_Ex++shMdpFpafg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-01 13:48               ` Matt Fleming
2014-07-01 13:48                 ` Matt Fleming
2014-06-26 10:09   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] efi/arm64: preserve FP/SIMD registers on UEFI runtime services calls Ard Biesheuvel
2014-06-26 10:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
     [not found]     ` <1403777346-28629-3-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04 15:45       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-07-04 15:45         ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found]         ` <20140704154522.GJ16404-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04 15:51           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-04 15:51             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-04 16:59             ` Catalin Marinas
2014-07-04 16:59               ` Catalin Marinas
     [not found]               ` <20140704165955.GL16404-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-04 17:15                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-04 17:15                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-06-26 13:58   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] efi: preserve NEON registers on UEFI " Mark Salter
2014-06-26 13:58     ` Mark Salter
     [not found]     ` <1403791087.755.120.camel-PDpCo7skNiwAicBL8TP8PQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-26 14:22       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-06-26 14:22         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-01 13:26   ` Matt Fleming
2014-07-01 13:26     ` Matt Fleming
     [not found]     ` <20140701132638.GC7539-HNK1S37rvNbeXh+fF434Mdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2014-07-01 13:46       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-01 13:46         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-07-08 15:33         ` Olivier Martin
2014-07-08 15:33         ` Olivier Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140704154522.GJ16404@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnigg8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Olivier.Martin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roy.franz-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.