From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>,
"Giori, Kathy" <kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>,
"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: add spectral scan feature
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:59:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201407211159.26103.sw@simonwunderlich.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmrn0ddGe=p_d9+vCpMUMQ6dKhL+DmZ76OicacmxoYVMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Michal,
thanks for the review! I agree to most points and will fixed them in the next
revision, for the rest I'm putting comments below:
[...]
> > + nf_list1 = __le32_to_cpu(event->hdr.nf_list_1);
> > + nf_list2 = __le32_to_cpu(event->hdr.nf_list_2);
> > + chain_idx = MS(reg0, SEARCH_FFT_REPORT_REG0_FFT_CHN_IDX);
> > + switch (chain_idx) {
> > + case 0:
> > + fft_sample->noise = __cpu_to_be16(nf_list1 & 0xffffu);
>
> Are you sure you want to & nf_list1 itself *before* the byte swap? You
> probably won't see a difference with an intel host system which is
> little-endian just like the target device.
That is intended as written: with le32_to_cpu() above we get the data into
host order to process it, then we get the 16-bit noise values according to the
chain index, and finally convert it to big endian as this is our exchange
format to userspace - as you can see, we do the same for the other 16bit
members of fft_sample as well.
[...]
> > + arvif = ath10k_get_spectral_vdev(ar);
> > + if (!arvif)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + vdev_id = arvif->vdev_id;
> > +
> > + if (ar->spectral_mode == SPECTRAL_DISABLED)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + res = ath10k_wmi_vdev_spectral_enable(ar, vdev_id,
> > +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_TRIGGER_CMD_CLEAR, +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_ENABLE_CMD_ENABLE); + if (res < 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + res = ath10k_wmi_vdev_spectral_enable(ar, vdev_id,
> > +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_TRIGGER_CMD_TRIGGER, +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_ENABLE_CMD_ENABLE); + if (res < 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static int ath10k_spectral_scan_config(struct ath10k *ar,
> > + enum ath10k_spectral_mode mode)
> > +{
> > + struct wmi_vdev_spectral_conf_arg arg;
> > + struct ath10k_vif *arvif;
> > + int vdev_id, count, res = 0;
> > +
>
> Ditto. lockdep_assert_held().
Actually both functions are calling ath10k_get_spectral_vdev() which already
has that assert, but it doesn't hurt to put it here as well. Will do. :)
[...]
>
> Did you test this against a firmware crash while spectral scan is
> enabled? ar->spectral_mode will be left as-is when restart is
> performed but no spectral scan will be actually configured. You either
> need to restart spectral scan (better from user perspective) or clear
> out the old mode (easier to code, but bad from user perspective
> because suddenly spectral scan would be stopped implicitly by device
> crash).
No, I didn't test that against a firmware crash yet ... Restarting spectral
would probably a good idea in endless mode, but not if "count" has been set.
I'll look into that and propose something in the next iteration.
Thanks. :)
Simon
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
Mathias Kretschmer <mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de>,
"Giori, Kathy" <kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: add spectral scan feature
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:59:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201407211159.26103.sw@simonwunderlich.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQmrn0ddGe=p_d9+vCpMUMQ6dKhL+DmZ76OicacmxoYVMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Michal,
thanks for the review! I agree to most points and will fixed them in the next
revision, for the rest I'm putting comments below:
[...]
> > + nf_list1 = __le32_to_cpu(event->hdr.nf_list_1);
> > + nf_list2 = __le32_to_cpu(event->hdr.nf_list_2);
> > + chain_idx = MS(reg0, SEARCH_FFT_REPORT_REG0_FFT_CHN_IDX);
> > + switch (chain_idx) {
> > + case 0:
> > + fft_sample->noise = __cpu_to_be16(nf_list1 & 0xffffu);
>
> Are you sure you want to & nf_list1 itself *before* the byte swap? You
> probably won't see a difference with an intel host system which is
> little-endian just like the target device.
That is intended as written: with le32_to_cpu() above we get the data into
host order to process it, then we get the 16-bit noise values according to the
chain index, and finally convert it to big endian as this is our exchange
format to userspace - as you can see, we do the same for the other 16bit
members of fft_sample as well.
[...]
> > + arvif = ath10k_get_spectral_vdev(ar);
> > + if (!arvif)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + vdev_id = arvif->vdev_id;
> > +
> > + if (ar->spectral_mode == SPECTRAL_DISABLED)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + res = ath10k_wmi_vdev_spectral_enable(ar, vdev_id,
> > +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_TRIGGER_CMD_CLEAR, +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_ENABLE_CMD_ENABLE); + if (res < 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + res = ath10k_wmi_vdev_spectral_enable(ar, vdev_id,
> > +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_TRIGGER_CMD_TRIGGER, +
> > WMI_SPECTRAL_ENABLE_CMD_ENABLE); + if (res < 0)
> > + return res;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static int ath10k_spectral_scan_config(struct ath10k *ar,
> > + enum ath10k_spectral_mode mode)
> > +{
> > + struct wmi_vdev_spectral_conf_arg arg;
> > + struct ath10k_vif *arvif;
> > + int vdev_id, count, res = 0;
> > +
>
> Ditto. lockdep_assert_held().
Actually both functions are calling ath10k_get_spectral_vdev() which already
has that assert, but it doesn't hurt to put it here as well. Will do. :)
[...]
>
> Did you test this against a firmware crash while spectral scan is
> enabled? ar->spectral_mode will be left as-is when restart is
> performed but no spectral scan will be actually configured. You either
> need to restart spectral scan (better from user perspective) or clear
> out the old mode (easier to code, but bad from user perspective
> because suddenly spectral scan would be stopped implicitly by device
> crash).
No, I didn't test that against a firmware crash yet ... Restarting spectral
would probably a good idea in endless mode, but not if "count" has been set.
I'll look into that and propose something in the next iteration.
Thanks. :)
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-21 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 13:26 [PATCH 0/2] ath10k spectral scan support Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-18 13:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ath: Move spectral debugfs structs to shared header Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-18 13:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-18 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath10k: add spectral scan feature Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-18 13:26 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-21 4:15 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-21 4:15 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-21 9:43 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-21 9:43 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-22 4:59 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-22 4:59 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-22 5:02 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-22 5:02 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2014-07-21 6:56 ` Michal Kazior
2014-07-21 6:56 ` Michal Kazior
2014-07-21 9:59 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2014-07-21 9:59 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-21 10:15 ` Michal Kazior
2014-07-21 10:15 ` Michal Kazior
2014-07-21 12:13 ` Simon Wunderlich
2014-07-21 12:13 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201407211159.26103.sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
--cc=sven@narfation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.