* [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
@ 2014-07-23 0:14 Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-23 14:40 ` Martin Jansa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2014-07-23 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OpenEmbedded Development mailing list
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
---
diff --git a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
index 64a0a44..bfecb8c 100644
--- a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
# Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
# for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
# the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
# not matter.
diff --git a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
index 2a5a428..9d7a60a 100644
--- a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
# Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
# for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
# the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
# not matter.
diff --git a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
index f3fc45d..d8faf21 100644
--- a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
# Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
# for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
# the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
# not matter.
diff --git a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
index ca81eb1..9289a8f 100644
--- a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
+++ b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
# search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
# Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
# for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
-# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
+# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
# the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
# not matter.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
2014-07-23 0:14 [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments Robert P. J. Day
@ 2014-07-23 14:40 ` Martin Jansa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2014-07-23 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4161 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 08:14:32PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Applying: Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
error: patch failed: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-oe/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf:4
error: meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf:4
error: toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments
Can you please rebase and resend?
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> index 64a0a44..bfecb8c 100644
> --- a/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-multimedia/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
> # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
> # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
> # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
> # not matter.
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> index 2a5a428..9d7a60a 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
> # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
> # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
> # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
> # not matter.
>
> diff --git a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> index f3fc45d..d8faf21 100644
> --- a/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-systemd/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
> # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
> # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
> # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
> # not matter.
>
> diff --git a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> index ca81eb1..9289a8f 100644
> --- a/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/toolchain-layer/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> # search the directories from first to last as specified in BBPATH
> # Therefore if you want a given layer to be considered high priority
> # for the .inc and .conf etc. then consider it adding at the beginning
> -# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILES_PRIORITY to resolve
> +# of BBPATH. For bblayers bitbake will use BBFILE_PRIORITY to resolve
> # the recipe contention so the order of directories in BBFILES does
> # not matter.
>
>
> --
>
> ========================================================================
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
> http://crashcourse.ca
>
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> ========================================================================
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-23 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-23 0:14 [meta-oe][PATCH] Correct spelling of "BBFILES_PRIORITY" in comments Robert P. J. Day
2014-07-23 14:40 ` Martin Jansa
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.