All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: spi: request all csgpio in spi probe
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:32:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140729113236.GM17528@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140728223859.GA3214@piout.net>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:38:59AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

> Mark: maybe it would make sense to do devm_gpio_request_one() in
> of_spi_register_master(), after of_get_named_gpio.

You need to transition all the drivers doing things manually but yes.
As I keep saying all the GPIO handling needs to be completely
refactored.

> While this solves the particular issue Ji?? is seeing, this will not
> solve the case where PA14 (CS0) is not used by the spi driver at all. It
> will remained muxed as CS0 and toggle when the spi master needs to
> access CS0 until another driver muxes it to something else. I still
> believe we should explicitly ask pinctrl to mux them as gpios.

I'm just guessing as to what the issue that he's seeing is but isn't
this just saying that the board pinmuxing is wrong?  If the board
doesn't want the pin to be used by the SPI controller it shouldn't be 
configuring it that way.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140729/77c3082f/attachment.sig>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Jiří Prchal" <jiri.prchal@aksignal.cz>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
	voice.shen@atmel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: spi: request all csgpio in spi probe
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 12:32:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140729113236.GM17528@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140728223859.GA3214@piout.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 937 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:38:59AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:

> Mark: maybe it would make sense to do devm_gpio_request_one() in
> of_spi_register_master(), after of_get_named_gpio.

You need to transition all the drivers doing things manually but yes.
As I keep saying all the GPIO handling needs to be completely
refactored.

> While this solves the particular issue Jiří is seeing, this will not
> solve the case where PA14 (CS0) is not used by the spi driver at all. It
> will remained muxed as CS0 and toggle when the spi master needs to
> access CS0 until another driver muxes it to something else. I still
> believe we should explicitly ask pinctrl to mux them as gpios.

I'm just guessing as to what the issue that he's seeing is but isn't
this just saying that the board pinmuxing is wrong?  If the board
doesn't want the pin to be used by the SPI controller it shouldn't be 
configuring it that way.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-28 11:43 [PATCH] ARM: at91: spi: request all csgpio in spi probe Jiri Prchal
2014-07-28 11:43 ` Jiri Prchal
2014-07-28 11:43 ` Jiri Prchal
2014-07-28 12:21 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-28 12:21   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-28 12:21   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-28 13:06   ` Jiří Prchal
2014-07-28 13:06     ` Jiří Prchal
2014-07-28 22:38     ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-28 22:38       ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-28 22:38       ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-29  8:00       ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-29  8:00         ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-29  8:00         ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-31 15:59         ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 15:59           ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 15:59           ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 16:10           ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-07-31 16:10             ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-07-31 16:48             ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 16:48               ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 16:48               ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-07-31 17:05               ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-07-31 17:05                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-07-31 17:05                 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2014-07-29 11:32       ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-07-29 11:32         ` Mark Brown
2014-07-28 15:06 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-28 15:06   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-28 15:06   ` Boris BREZILLON

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140729113236.GM17528@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.