From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
juno.choi@lge.com, seungho1.park@lge.com,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] zsmalloc: change return value unit of zs_get_total_size_bytes
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 23:23:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140821232319.GG10703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZtONBuZOORHAF0UHEZM7Aybuoesg3fyjnu9ACj_F7O5G35Og@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > zs_get_total_size_bytes returns a amount of memory zsmalloc
> > consumed with *byte unit* but zsmalloc operates *page unit*
> > rather than byte unit so let's change the API so benefit
> > we could get is that reduce unnecessary overhead
> > (ie, change page unit with byte unit) in zsmalloc.
> >
> > Now, zswap can rollback to zswap_pool_pages.
> > Over to zswap guys ;-)
>
> We could change zpool/zswap over to total pages instead of total
> bytes, since both zbud and zsmalloc now report size in pages. The
> only downside would be if either changed later to not use only whole
> pages (or if they start using huge pages for storage...), but for what
> they do that seems unlikely. After this patch is finalized I can
> write up a quick patch unless Seth disagrees (or already has a patch
> :)
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/zsmalloc.h | 2 +-
> > mm/zsmalloc.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index d00831c3d731..302dd37bcea3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static ssize_t mem_used_total_show(struct device *dev,
> >
> > down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > if (init_done(zram))
> > - val = zs_get_total_size_bytes(meta->mem_pool);
> > + val = zs_get_total_size(meta->mem_pool);
> > up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> >
> > - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", val);
> > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", val << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t max_comp_streams_show(struct device *dev,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > index e44d634e7fb7..105b56e45d23 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle,
> > enum zs_mapmode mm);
> > void zs_unmap_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle);
> >
> > -u64 zs_get_total_size_bytes(struct zs_pool *pool);
> > +unsigned long zs_get_total_size(struct zs_pool *pool);
>
> minor naming suggestion, but since the name is changing anyway,
> "zs_get_total_size" implies to me the units are bytes, would
> "zs_get_total_pages" be clearer that it's returning size in # of
> pages, not bytes?
It's better. Will change.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>,
juno.choi@lge.com, seungho1.park@lge.com,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>,
David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] zsmalloc: change return value unit of zs_get_total_size_bytes
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 23:23:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140821232319.GG10703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZtONBuZOORHAF0UHEZM7Aybuoesg3fyjnu9ACj_F7O5G35Og@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > zs_get_total_size_bytes returns a amount of memory zsmalloc
> > consumed with *byte unit* but zsmalloc operates *page unit*
> > rather than byte unit so let's change the API so benefit
> > we could get is that reduce unnecessary overhead
> > (ie, change page unit with byte unit) in zsmalloc.
> >
> > Now, zswap can rollback to zswap_pool_pages.
> > Over to zswap guys ;-)
>
> We could change zpool/zswap over to total pages instead of total
> bytes, since both zbud and zsmalloc now report size in pages. The
> only downside would be if either changed later to not use only whole
> pages (or if they start using huge pages for storage...), but for what
> they do that seems unlikely. After this patch is finalized I can
> write up a quick patch unless Seth disagrees (or already has a patch
> :)
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/zsmalloc.h | 2 +-
> > mm/zsmalloc.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > index d00831c3d731..302dd37bcea3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> > @@ -103,10 +103,10 @@ static ssize_t mem_used_total_show(struct device *dev,
> >
> > down_read(&zram->init_lock);
> > if (init_done(zram))
> > - val = zs_get_total_size_bytes(meta->mem_pool);
> > + val = zs_get_total_size(meta->mem_pool);
> > up_read(&zram->init_lock);
> >
> > - return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", val);
> > + return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llu\n", val << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > }
> >
> > static ssize_t max_comp_streams_show(struct device *dev,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > index e44d634e7fb7..105b56e45d23 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> > @@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ void *zs_map_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle,
> > enum zs_mapmode mm);
> > void zs_unmap_object(struct zs_pool *pool, unsigned long handle);
> >
> > -u64 zs_get_total_size_bytes(struct zs_pool *pool);
> > +unsigned long zs_get_total_size(struct zs_pool *pool);
>
> minor naming suggestion, but since the name is changing anyway,
> "zs_get_total_size" implies to me the units are bytes, would
> "zs_get_total_pages" be clearer that it's returning size in # of
> pages, not bytes?
It's better. Will change.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-21 0:27 [PATCH v3 0/4] zram memory control enhance Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] zsmalloc: move pages_allocated to zs_pool Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] zsmalloc: change return value unit of zs_get_total_size_bytes Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 18:53 ` Dan Streetman
2014-08-21 18:53 ` Dan Streetman
2014-08-21 23:22 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 23:22 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 23:22 ` Seth Jennings
2014-08-21 23:22 ` Seth Jennings
2014-08-21 23:23 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2014-08-21 23:23 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] zram: zram memory size limitation Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 19:08 ` Dan Streetman
2014-08-21 19:08 ` Dan Streetman
2014-08-21 23:36 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 23:36 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] zram: report maximum used memory Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 0:27 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 2:20 ` David Horner
2014-08-21 2:20 ` David Horner
2014-08-21 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 2:41 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 3:03 ` David Horner
2014-08-21 3:03 ` David Horner
2014-08-21 4:33 ` Minchan Kim
2014-08-21 4:33 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140821232319.GG10703@gmail.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
--cc=ds2horner@gmail.com \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=juno.choi@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=semenzato@google.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=seungho1.park@lge.com \
--cc=sjennings@variantweb.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.